PT. Laboratoire d'analyse du mouvement, Institut de Formation en Masso- Kinésithérapie Saint Michel / Hôpital de la Porte Verte, 6 Avenue du Maréchal Franchet d'Esperey, Versailles, 78000, France.
Département de chirurgie orthopédique, Groupe Hospitalier du Havre, Le Havre cedex, BP24, 76083, France.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 28;25(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07310-7.
After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients have limited knee range of motion (ROM), trophic changes and pain. Cryotherapy and compression are recommended in the literature, but no study has shown that cryotherapy and compression combined leads to better results than cryotherapy alone. The primary objective was to compare knee ROM after 21 days of rehabilitation post-TKA between patients who underwent rehabilitation with compressive cryotherapy with those who had cryotherapy alone. The secondary objectives were to compare other trophic, pain and functional outcomes.
Forty patients were randomized into two groups: Standard Cryotherapy (SC = 20, median age 77 years), which applied cold packs along with their rehabilitation; and Compressive Cryotherapy (CC = 20, median age 76 years), which received cold compression. Knee joint's passive and active ROM (primary outcome) were measured with a goniometer. Knee's circumference, fluctuation test, pain at rest and during activity, 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and KOOS questionnaire were secondary outcomes. The groups were compared on D1 (baseline) and D21 of rehabilitation. A survival analysis has compared the groups on D1, D8, D15, D21.
All subjects had a significant improvement in all the parameters on D21 relative to D1 (p < .05), except for pain at rest (p = .065 for CC and p = .052 for SC). On D21, the CC group had a significantly larger improvement in the joint effusion (p = .002), pain during activity (p = .005), 6MWT (p = .018) and KOOS (p = .004) than the SC group. Based on the survival analysis, the CC group had significantly faster improvement in the joint ROM (p = .011 for flexion and p = .038 for extension) and knee circumference (p = .013) than the SC group.
Both cryotherapy methods improved joint ROM, trophic changes, pain and function. Adding dynamic compression to a cryotherapy protocol provided further benefits: a significantly faster improvement in passive knee flexion ROM, a greater reduction of swelling, and pain during activity. Similarly, walking distance and KOOS questionnaire were significantly better for CC.
The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database on 14/09/2023 (identifier: NCT06037824).
全膝关节置换术后(TKA)患者的膝关节活动范围(ROM)有限,存在营养变化和疼痛。文献中推荐使用冷冻疗法和压缩疗法,但尚无研究表明冷冻疗法和压缩疗法联合使用比单独使用冷冻疗法效果更好。主要目的是比较 TKA 后 21 天康复期间接受压缩冷冻疗法和单独冷冻疗法的患者的膝关节 ROM。次要目标是比较其他营养、疼痛和功能结果。
40 名患者随机分为两组:标准冷冻疗法(SC=20,中位年龄 77 岁),在康复的同时使用冷敷袋;和压缩冷冻疗法(CC=20,中位年龄 76 岁),接受冷压缩治疗。使用量角器测量膝关节的被动和主动 ROM(主要结果)。膝关节周长、波动试验、休息和活动时的疼痛、6 分钟步行试验(6MWT)和 KOOS 问卷为次要结果。在康复的 D1(基线)和 D21 比较两组。生存分析比较了 D1、D8、D15、D21 时的组间差异。
所有患者在 D21 时所有参数均较 D1 显著改善(p<0.05),但休息时疼痛除外(CC 组 p=0.065,SC 组 p=0.052)。在 D21 时,CC 组关节积液(p=0.002)、活动时疼痛(p=0.005)、6MWT(p=0.018)和 KOOS(p=0.004)的改善明显大于 SC 组。基于生存分析,CC 组膝关节 ROM(p=0.011,屈曲;p=0.038,伸展)和膝关节周长(p=0.013)的改善速度明显快于 SC 组。
两种冷冻疗法均改善了关节 ROM、营养变化、疼痛和功能。在冷冻疗法方案中加入动态压缩可带来进一步的益处:膝关节被动屈曲 ROM 的改善速度明显加快,肿胀程度显著减轻,活动时疼痛减轻。同样,CC 组的步行距离和 KOOS 问卷也明显更好。
该研究于 2023 年 9 月 14 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库注册(标识符:NCT06037824)。