ACDF手术中使用的骨生物制剂给药策略:对融合率及相关并发症的影响。一项系统文献综述。
Dosing Strategy for Osteobiologics Used in ACDF Surgery: Influence on Fusion Rates and Associated Complications. A Systematic Literature Review.
作者信息
Hamouda Waeel O, Veranis Sotiris, Krol Oscar, Sagoo Navraj S, Passias Peter G, Buser Zorica, Meisel Hans Jörg, Yoon Tim
机构信息
Department of Neurosurgery, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Research, and Teaching Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Neurological & Spinal surgery service, Security Forces Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
出版信息
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):129S-140S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231195766.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the available evidence related to dose-dependent effectiveness (i.e., bone fusion) and morbidity of osteobiologics used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
METHODS
Studies with more than 9 adult patients with degenerated/herniated cervical discs operated for one-to four-levels ACDF reporting used osteobiologics doses, fusion rates at six months or later, and related comorbidities were included. PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane were searched through September 2021. Data extracted in spread sheet and risk of bias assessed using MINORS and Rob-2.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were selected and sub-grouped into BMP and non-BMP osteobiologics. For the 10 BMP studies, doses varied from 0.26 to 2.1 mg in 649 patients with fusion rates of 95.3 to 100% at 12 months. For other osteobiologics, each of six studies reported one type of osteobiologic in certain dose/concentration/volume in a total of 580 patients with fusion rates of 6.8 to 96.9% at 12 months. Risk of bias was low in three of the 13 non-randomized (18.75%) and in all the three randomized studies (100%).
CONCLUSIONS
Taking into account the inconsistent reporting within available literature, for BMP usage in ACDF, doses lower than 0.7 mg per level can achieve equal successful fusion rates as higher doses, and there is no complication-free dose proved yet. It seems that the lower the dose the lower the incidence of serious complications. As for non-BMP osteobiologics the studies are very limited for each osteobiologic and thus conclusions must be drawn individually and with caution.
研究设计
系统评价。
目的
评估与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)中使用的骨生物制剂的剂量依赖性有效性(即骨融合)和发病率相关的现有证据。
方法
纳入对9名以上患有退变/突出颈椎间盘且接受一至四级ACDF手术的成年患者进行研究的报告,这些报告需包含所使用的骨生物制剂剂量、六个月或更晚时的融合率以及相关合并症。检索截至2021年9月的PubMed、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials和Cochrane数据库。数据提取到电子表格中,并使用MINORS和Rob-2评估偏倚风险。
结果
选择了16项研究,并将其分为BMP和非BMP骨生物制剂亚组。对于10项BMP研究,649名患者的剂量从0.26毫克到2.1毫克不等,12个月时融合率为95.3%至100%。对于其他骨生物制剂,六项研究中的每项研究均报告了一种特定剂量/浓度/体积的骨生物制剂,总共580名患者,12个月时融合率为6.8%至96.9%。13项非随机研究中有3项(18.75%)以及所有3项随机研究(100%)的偏倚风险较低。
结论
考虑到现有文献中报告的不一致性,对于ACDF中BMP的使用,每级低于0.7毫克的剂量可实现与较高剂量相同的成功融合率,且尚未证明有无并发症的剂量。似乎剂量越低,严重并发症的发生率越低。至于非BMP骨生物制剂,针对每种骨生物制剂的研究非常有限,因此必须谨慎地单独得出结论。
相似文献
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1