Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0296768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296768. eCollection 2024.
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadian primary care practices rapidly adapted to provide care virtually. Most family physicians lacked prior training or expertise with virtual care. In the absence of formal guidance, they made individual decisions about in-person versus remote care based on clinical judgement, their longitudinal relationships with patients, and personal risk assessments. Our objective was to explore Canadian family physicians' perspectives on the strengths and limitations of virtual care implementation for their patient populations during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for the integration of virtual care into broader primary care practice.
We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with family physicians working in four Canadian jurisdictions (Vancouver Coastal health region, British Columbia; Southwestern Ontario; the province of Nova Scotia; and Eastern Health region, Newfoundland and Labrador). We analyzed interview data using a structured applied thematic approach.
We interviewed 68 family physicians and identified four distinct themes during our analysis related to experiences with and perspectives on virtual care: (1) changes in access to primary care; (2) quality and efficacy of care provided virtually; (3) patient and provider comfort with virtual modalities; and (4) necessary supports for virtual care moving forward.
The move to virtual care enhanced access to care for select patients and was helpful for family physicians to better manage their panels. However, virtual care also created access challenges for some patients (e.g., people who are underhoused or living in areas without good phone or internet access) and for some types of care (e.g., care that required access to medical devices). Family physicians are optimistic about the ongoing integration of virtual care into broader primary care delivery, but guidance, regulations, and infrastructure investments are needed to ensure equitable access and to maximize quality of care.
在 COVID-19 大流行早期,加拿大初级保健实践迅速适应了虚拟护理模式。大多数家庭医生缺乏虚拟护理方面的培训或专业知识。在缺乏正式指导的情况下,他们根据临床判断、与患者的长期关系和个人风险评估,自行决定面对面护理与远程护理的取舍。我们的目的是探讨加拿大家庭医生在 COVID-19 大流行期间对其患者群体实施虚拟护理的优势和局限性的看法,以及将虚拟护理纳入更广泛的初级保健实践的意义。
我们对在加拿大四个司法管辖区(温哥华沿海卫生局,不列颠哥伦比亚省;安大略省西南部;新斯科舍省;以及纽芬兰和拉布拉多省东健康区)工作的家庭医生进行了半结构化定性访谈。我们使用结构化应用主题分析方法分析访谈数据。
我们采访了 68 名家庭医生,在分析过程中确定了与虚拟护理体验和观点相关的四个不同主题:(1)获得初级保健的变化;(2)虚拟护理提供的质量和效果;(3)患者和提供者对虚拟模式的舒适度;(4)虚拟护理的未来必要支持。
虚拟护理的实施改善了某些患者的护理获取途径,也有助于家庭医生更好地管理其患者群体。然而,虚拟护理也为一些患者(例如,无家可归者或居住在电话或互联网接入不佳地区的人)和某些类型的护理(例如,需要医疗设备访问的护理)带来了获取途径方面的挑战。家庭医生对虚拟护理纳入更广泛的初级保健服务的持续整合持乐观态度,但需要指导、法规和基础设施投资,以确保公平获取并最大限度地提高护理质量。