George Mason University Department of Criminology, Law and Society, 4400 University Drive, 4F4, Fairfax, VA, 22030, United States.
Indiana University O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, 801 W. Michigan Street BS 3025, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;345:116723. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116723. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
People with mental illness are overrepresented in United States (US) criminal legal systems. In response, alternatives to traditional police response to behavioral health emergencies have become more common, despite limited evidence for their effectiveness. We conducted the first randomized controlled trial of a police-mental health co-response team to determine program effectiveness relative to a police-as-usual response on key outcomes identified by community stakeholders.
Between January 2020 and March 2021, we randomized behavioral health emergency calls for service in one of six police districts in Indianapolis, Indiana to receive a co-response or police-as-usual response during operational hours between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. Mondays - Fridays. Eligible calls for service were determined via pre-specified phrases indicating a behavioral health incident over the police dispatch radio. Researchers then communicated random assignment with the co-response team to indicate whether they should respond or withhold. Logistic and negative binomial regression were used to assess group differences in emergency medical services (EMS) events within 12 months of the randomized incident along with jail booking, outpatient encounters, and emergency department visits.
We randomized 686 calls for service with co-response completed in 264 cases and police-as-usual response in 267 cases. The overall rate of attrition was similar across conditions and the final sample included 211 co-responses and 224 police-as-usual responses. We found no significant differences in any EMS event (odds ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.88, p = .246) or event counts (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.52-1.37, p = .504). We also found no differences in secondary outcomes (jail booking, outpatient encounters, and emergency department visits).
A police-mental health co-response team model was not more effective than traditional police response on key outcomes. Co-response team models, such as the one reported here, may unintentionally foster emergency services utilization among persons with behavioral health needs. Without a functioning national mental health system, communities in the US will continue to struggle to identify solutions to meet the needs of community members with complex behavioral health issues.
精神疾病患者在美国(美国)刑事法律系统中所占比例过高。作为回应,除了传统的警察对行为健康紧急情况的反应外,其他替代方案变得越来越普遍,尽管它们的有效性证据有限。我们进行了首次针对警察-心理健康联合反应小组的随机对照试验,以确定相对于警察常规反应,在社区利益相关者确定的关键结果方面,该计划的有效性。
2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月,我们在印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯的六个警察区中的一个区随机分配行为健康服务呼叫,以便在上午 10 点至下午 5 点之间的运营时间内接收联合反应或警察常规反应。通过预先指定的短语来确定符合条件的服务呼叫,这些短语表示通过警察调度无线电发出的行为健康事件。然后,研究人员与联合反应小组进行沟通,随机分配以指示他们是否应该做出反应或保留。逻辑回归和负二项回归用于评估在随机事件发生后的 12 个月内,紧急医疗服务(EMS)事件、监狱预订、门诊就诊和急诊就诊的组间差异。
我们对 686 个服务呼叫进行了随机分配,其中 264 个案例完成了联合反应,267 个案例进行了警察常规反应。在所有条件下,整体流失率相似,最终样本包括 211 次联合反应和 224 次警察常规反应。我们没有发现任何 EMS 事件(优势比 [OR]:1.26;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.85-1.88,p=0.246)或事件计数(发病率比 [IRR]:0.85;95% CI:0.52-1.37,p=0.504)存在显着差异。我们还没有发现次要结果(监狱预订、门诊就诊和急诊就诊)的差异。
警察-心理健康联合反应小组模型在关键结果上并不优于传统警察反应。像这里报告的那样,警察-心理健康联合反应小组模型可能会无意中促进有行为健康需求的人对紧急服务的利用。在美国,由于没有运作良好的国家心理健康系统,社区将继续努力寻找解决方案,以满足有复杂行为健康问题的社区成员的需求。