Suppr超能文献

在轻度认知障碍中识别帕金森综合征。

Identifying parkinsonism in mild cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Fernando Rishira, Thomas Alan J, Hamilton Calum A, Durcan Rory, Barker Sally, Ciafone Joanna, Barnett Nicola, Olsen Kirsty, Firbank Michael, Roberts Gemma, Lloyd Jim, Petrides George, Colloby Sean, Allan Louise M, McKeith Ian G, O'Brien John T, Taylor John-Paul, Donaghy Paul C

机构信息

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, UK.

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, UK; Nuclear Medicine Department, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar 15;458:122941. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122941. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical parkinsonism is a core diagnostic feature for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) but can be challenging to identify. A five-item scale derived from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) has been recommended for the assessment of parkinsonism in dementia. This study aimed to determine whether the five-item scale is effective to identify parkinsonism in MCI.

METHODS

Participants with MCI from two cohorts (n = 146) had a physical examination including the UPDRS and [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT striatal dopaminergic imaging. Participants were classified as having clinical parkinsonism (P+) or no parkinsonism (P-), and with abnormal striatal dopaminergic imaging (D+) or normal imaging (D-). The five-item scale was the sum of UPDRS tremor at rest, bradykinesia, action tremor, facial expression, and rigidity scores. The ability of the scale to differentiate P+D+ and P-D- participants was examined.

RESULTS

The five-item scale had an AUROC of 0.92 in Cohort 1, but the 7/8 cut-off defined for dementia had low sensitivity to identify P+D+ participants (sensitivity 25%, specificity 100%). Optimal sensitivity and specificity was obtained at a 3/4 cut-off (sensitivity 83%, specificity 88%). In Cohort 2, the five-item scale had an AUROC of 0.97, and the 3/4 cut-off derived from Cohort 1 showed sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 82% to differentiate P+D+ from P-D- participants. The five-item scale was not effective in differentiating D+ from D- participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The five-item scale is effective to identify parkinsonism in MCI, but a lower threshold must be used in MCI compared with dementia.

摘要

引言

临床帕金森综合征是路易体轻度认知障碍(MCI-LB)的核心诊断特征,但识别起来可能具有挑战性。一种源自统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)的五项量表已被推荐用于评估痴呆中的帕金森综合征。本研究旨在确定该五项量表是否能有效识别MCI中的帕金森综合征。

方法

来自两个队列的146名MCI参与者接受了包括UPDRS和[123I]-FP-CIT SPECT纹状体多巴胺能成像在内的体格检查。参与者被分类为患有临床帕金森综合征(P+)或无帕金森综合征(P-),以及纹状体多巴胺能成像异常(D+)或成像正常(D-)。五项量表是UPDRS静止性震颤、运动迟缓、动作性震颤、面部表情和强直评分的总和。检验了该量表区分P+D+和P-D-参与者的能力。

结果

在队列1中,五项量表的曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.92,但为痴呆定义的7/8临界值对识别P+D+参与者的敏感性较低(敏感性25%,特异性100%)。在3/4临界值时获得了最佳敏感性和特异性(敏感性83%,特异性88%)。在队列2中,五项量表的AUROC为0.97,源自队列1的3/4临界值对区分P+D+和P-D-参与者显示出100%的敏感性和82%的特异性。五项量表在区分D+和D-参与者方面无效。

结论

五项量表能有效识别MCI中的帕金森综合征,但与痴呆相比,在MCI中必须使用更低的临界值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验