Medical Physics and Biophysics, Physics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia;
Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
J Nucl Med. 2024 Apr 1;65(4):566-572. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266268.
The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of single-time-point (STP) renal dosimetry imaging using SPECT/CT data, a nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) model, and a population-based model selection (PBMS) in a large population for Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen therapy. Biokinetic data (mean ± SD) of [Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in kidneys at time points 1 (1.8 ± 0.8 h), 2 (18.7 ± 0.9 h), 3 (42.6 ± 1.0 h), 4 (66.3 ± 0.9 h), and 5 (160.3 ± 24.2 h) after injection were obtained from 63 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using SPECT/CT. Thirteen functions were derived from various parameterizations of 1- to 5-exponential functions. The function's parameters were fitted in the NLME framework to the all-time-point (ATP) data. The PBMS NLME method was performed using the goodness-of-fit test and Akaike weight to select the best function fitting the data. The best function from ATP fitting was used to calculate the reference time-integrated activity and absorbed doses. In STP dosimetry, the parameters of a particular patient with STP data were fitted simultaneously to the STP data at different time points of that patient with ATP data of all other patients. The parameters from STP fitting were used to calculate the STP time-integrated activity and absorbed doses. Relative deviations (RDs) and root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) were used to analyze the accuracy of the calculated STP absorbed dose compared with the reference absorbed dose obtained from the best-fit ATP function. The performance of STP dosimetry using PBMS NLME modeling was compared with the Hänscheid and Madsen methods. The function [Formula: see text] was selected as the best-fit ATP function, with an Akaike weight of 100%. For STP dosimetry, the STP measurement by SPECT/CT at time point 3 (42.6 ± 1.0 h) showed a relatively low mean RD of -4.4% ± 9.4% and median RD of -0.7%. Time point 3 had the lowest RMSE value compared with those at the other 4 time points. The RMSEs of the absorbed dose RDs for time points 1-5 were 23%, 16%, 10%, 20%, and 53%, respectively. The STP dosimetry using the PBMS NLME method outperformed the Hänscheid and Madsen methods for all investigated time points. Our results show that a single measurement of SPECT/CT at 2 d after injection might be used to calculate accurate kidney-absorbed doses using the NLME method and PBMS.
本研究旨在使用 SPECT/CT 数据、非线性混合效应 (NLME) 模型和基于群体的模型选择 (PBMS) 在大人群中调查单次时间点 (STP) 肾剂量成像在 Lu 标记前列腺特异性膜抗原治疗中的准确性。使用 SPECT/CT 从 63 名转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者中获得注射后 1(1.8±0.8 h)、2(18.7±0.9 h)、3(42.6±1.0 h)、4(66.3±0.9 h)和 5(160.3±24.2 h)时间点的[Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 的生物动力学数据(平均值±标准差)。使用 NLME 框架将 1 至 5 指数函数的各种参数化拟合到所有时间点 (ATP) 数据中。PBMS NLME 方法使用拟合优度检验和 Akaike 权重来选择最佳函数以拟合数据。从 ATP 拟合中选择最佳函数以计算参考时间积分活性和吸收剂量。在 STP 剂量测定中,同时将特定患者的 STP 数据的参数拟合到该患者的 STP 数据中,同时拟合所有其他患者的 ATP 数据。从 STP 拟合中获得的参数用于计算 STP 时间积分活性和吸收剂量。使用相对偏差 (RD) 和均方根误差 (RMSE) 分析与从最佳拟合 ATP 函数获得的参考吸收剂量相比,计算得出的 STP 吸收剂量的准确性。比较了使用 PBMS NLME 建模的 STP 剂量测定的性能与 Hänscheid 和 Madsen 方法。选择函数[公式:见文本]作为最佳拟合 ATP 函数,Akaike 权重为 100%。对于 STP 剂量测定,SPECT/CT 在 3 时间点(42.6±1.0 h)的 STP 测量显示出相对较低的平均 RD(-4.4%±9.4%)和中位数 RD(-0.7%)。与其他 4 个时间点相比,3 时间点的 RMSE 值最低。1-5 时间点的吸收剂量 RD 的 RMSE 分别为 23%、16%、10%、20%和 53%。使用 PBMS NLME 方法的 STP 剂量测定在所有研究时间点均优于 Hänscheid 和 Madsen 方法。我们的结果表明,在注射后 2 天使用 SPECT/CT 进行单次测量,使用 NLME 方法和 PBMS 可能可以计算出准确的肾脏吸收剂量。