Farhad Alireza, Hasheminia Mohsen, Hekmatian Ehsan, Mojiri Vahid
Department of Endodontics, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Endodontics, Dental Material Research Center, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Jan 25;21:9. eCollection 2024.
Knowledge about the anatomic variations of the root canal system and their prevalence is necessary for clinicians to ideally clean the root canal system. The anatomic complexity of the root canal system is one of the reasons for its inadequate debridement, resulting in residual microorganisms and root canal treatment failure. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of middle mesial root canals in mandibular molars in an Iranian population.
The samples in the present descriptive/cross-sectional study consisted of mandibular first and second molars ( = 100, with 50 first and 50 s molars). A convenient sampling method was used to collect samples. The teeth were mounted in gypsum and scanned using a micro-computed tomography unit. The images were reconstructed with software, and the relevant checklist was completed by the observers. The data were analyzed with SPSS v26 using the Chi-squared test at a significance level of < 0.05.
The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal in the present study was 36% for mandibular first molars and 22% for mandibular second molars, with an overall prevalence of 29%. The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal was not significantly different between the first and second mandibular molars ( = 0.12). The mean distance between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canal orifices in the teeth with a middle mesial root canal was significantly higher than in those without the middle mesial root canal ( < 0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of the middle mesial root canal between the teeth with and without the second distal root canal ( = 0.89).
The prevalence of the middle mesial root canal in the studied population was 29%, which is significant clinically. In addition, the mean distance between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canal orifices in teeth with a middle mesial root canal was higher than that in teeth without this root canal.
临床医生要想理想地清洁根管系统,就必须了解根管系统的解剖变异及其发生率。根管系统的解剖复杂性是其清创不充分的原因之一,会导致残留微生物和根管治疗失败。本研究旨在评估伊朗人群下颌磨牙中近中根管的发生率。
本描述性/横断面研究的样本包括下颌第一和第二磨牙(n = 100,其中50颗第一磨牙和50颗第二磨牙)。采用便利抽样方法收集样本。将牙齿固定在石膏中,使用微型计算机断层扫描装置进行扫描。用软件重建图像,观察者完成相关检查表。使用SPSS v26软件进行数据分析,采用卡方检验,显著性水平为P < 0.05。
本研究中,下颌第一磨牙近中根管的发生率为36%,下颌第二磨牙为22%,总体发生率为29%。下颌第一磨牙和第二磨牙近中根管的发生率无显著差异(P = 0.12)。有近中根管的牙齿中,近中颊侧和近中舌侧根管口之间的平均距离显著高于无近中根管的牙齿(P < 0.001)。此外,有和无第二远中根管的牙齿中,近中根管的发生率无显著差异(P = 0.89)。
研究人群中近中根管的发生率为29%,具有临床意义。此外,有近中根管的牙齿中,近中颊侧和近中舌侧根管口之间的平均距离高于无该根管的牙齿。