Suppr超能文献

在基本心理需求的满足与受挫的个体概况背景下,压力、应对方式及生活满意度方面的人际差异。

Interpersonal differences in stress, coping, and satisfaction with life in the context of individual profiles of satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs.

作者信息

Barański Maciej, Poprawa Ryszard

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Health Psychol Rep. 2023 Aug 30;12(1):26-38. doi: 10.5114/hpr/165875. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Basic psychological need theory has identified three basic needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Need satisfaction is necessary for development and well-being, while need frustration can lead to maladaptive functioning. The study investigated the significance of individual profiles of basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration in experiencing stress, coping, and satisfaction with life.

PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE

Participants ( = 622, = 22.22 ± 4.30) completed the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Stress Appraisal Questionnaire, COPE Inventory, and Satisfaction with Life Scale. We performed exploratory factor analysis to identify coping styles, latent profile analysis to distinguish groups with specific need profiles, and MANOVA to demonstrate differences between these groups.

RESULTS

Five coping styles were identified: (1) problem-focused, (2) emotion-focused, (3) meaning-focused, (4) escape-avoidance, and (5) religious. The following groups of individuals characterized by specific profiles of basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration were distinguished: (1) mainly low satisfaction and high frustration of relatedness; (2) high satisfaction and low frustration of all basic needs; (3) low satisfaction and high frustration of all basic needs; (4) average satisfaction and frustration of all basic needs; (5) mainly low satisfaction and high frustration of competence. These groups significantly differ in perceived stress, coping styles, and life satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with profile 3 were the most stressed and tend to use escape-avoidance coping style. Participants with profile 2 coped using a problem-focused style and had higher life satisfaction. These findings indicate that a person-centered approach leads to a better understanding of experiencing stress and coping.

摘要

背景

基本心理需要理论确定了三种基本需要:自主性、能力和关联性。需要的满足对于发展和幸福是必要的,而需要的受挫会导致适应不良的功能。本研究调查了基本心理需要满足和受挫的个体概况在体验压力、应对方式和生活满意度方面的重要性。

参与者与程序

参与者((n = 622),(M = 22.22 ± 4.30))完成了基本心理需要满足与受挫量表、感知压力量表、压力评估问卷、应对方式量表和生活满意度量表。我们进行了探索性因素分析以确定应对方式,进行了潜在剖面分析以区分具有特定需要概况的群体,并进行了多变量方差分析以证明这些群体之间的差异。

结果

确定了五种应对方式:(1)以问题为中心;(2)以情绪为中心;(3)以意义为中心;(4)逃避回避;(5)宗教信仰。区分出了以下几组具有基本心理需要满足和受挫特定概况的个体:(1)主要是关联性的低满足和高受挫;(2)所有基本需要的高满足和低受挫;(3)所有基本需要的低满足和高受挫;(4)所有基本需要的中等满足和受挫;(5)主要是能力的低满足和高受挫。这些群体在感知压力、应对方式和生活满意度方面存在显著差异。

结论

概况3的个体压力最大,倾向于使用逃避回避的应对方式。概况2的参与者采用以问题为中心的应对方式,生活满意度更高。这些发现表明,以人为本的方法能更好地理解压力体验和应对方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/def7/10900975/58fd8d02b895/HPR-12-165875-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验