Clark Dan Pa, Donnelly Nick
Department of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Mar;78(3):474-489. doi: 10.1177/17470218241238737. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
The current study explores the role of attention in location memory for animals and objects. Participants completed an incidental learning task where they rated animals and objects with regard to either their ease of collection to win a scavenger hunt (Experiments 1a and b) or their distance from the centre of the computer screen (Experiment 2). The images of animals and objects were pseudo-randomly positioned on the screen in both experiments. After completing the incidental learning task (and a reverse counting distractor task), participants were then given a surprise location memory recall task. In the location memory recall task, items were shown in the centre of the screen and participants used the mouse to indicate the position the item had been shown during the incidental encoding task. The results of both experiments show that location memory for objects was more accurate than for animals. While we cannot definitively identify the mechanism responsible for the difference in the location memory of objects and animals, we propose that differences in the influence of object-based attention at encoding affect location memory when tested at recall.
当前的研究探讨了注意力在动物和物体位置记忆中的作用。参与者完成了一项附带学习任务,在该任务中,他们根据收集动物和物体以赢得寻宝游戏的难易程度(实验1a和1b)或它们与电脑屏幕中心的距离(实验2)对动物和物体进行评分。在两个实验中,动物和物体的图像都以伪随机的方式放置在屏幕上。在完成附带学习任务(以及一个反向计数干扰任务)后,参与者接着接受了一项位置记忆回忆的惊喜任务。在位置记忆回忆任务中,物品显示在屏幕中心,参与者使用鼠标指出该物品在附带编码任务中出现的位置。两个实验的结果都表明,物体的位置记忆比动物的更准确。虽然我们无法确切确定导致物体和动物位置记忆差异的机制,但我们认为,编码时基于物体的注意力影响的差异会在回忆测试时影响位置记忆。