Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar 1;39(2):e20220470. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0470.
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been shown to reduce postoperative complications. The feasibility of GDFT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients under general anesthesia has not yet been demonstrated. We examined whether GDFT could be applied in patients undergoing TAVR in general anesthesia and its impact on outcomes.
Forty consecutive TAVR patients in the prospective intervention group with GDFT were compared to 40 retrospective TAVR patients without GDFT. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, elective TAVR in general anesthesia, no participation in another interventional study. Exclusion criteria were lack of ability to consent study participation, pregnant or nursing patients, emergency procedures, preinterventional decubitus, tissue and/or extremity ischemia, peripheral arterial occlusive disease grade IV, atrial fibrillation or other severe heart rhythm disorder, necessity of usage of intra-aortic balloon pump. Stroke volume and stroke volume variation were determined with uncalibrated pulse contour analysis and optimized according to a predefined algorithm using 250 ml of hydroxyethyl starch.
Stroke volume could be increased by applying GDFT. The intervention group received more colloids and fewer crystalloids than control group. Total volume replacement did not differ. The incidence of overall complications as well as intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were comparable between both groups. GDFT was associated with a reduced incidence of delirium. Duration of anesthesia was shorter in the intervention group. Duration of the interventional procedure did not differ.
GDFT in the intervention group was associated with a reduced incidence of postinterventional delirium.
目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)已被证明可减少术后并发症。在全身麻醉下进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者中应用 GDFT 的可行性尚未得到证实。我们研究了 GDFT 是否可应用于全身麻醉下接受 TAVR 的患者及其对结局的影响。
前瞻性干预组的 40 例连续 TAVR 患者接受 GDFT,与 40 例无 GDFT 的回顾性 TAVR 患者进行比较。纳入标准为年龄≥18 岁,全身麻醉下择期 TAVR,不参与其他介入研究。排除标准为缺乏参与研究的能力、妊娠或哺乳期患者、急诊手术、术前卧位、组织和/或肢体缺血、外周动脉闭塞性疾病 IV 级、心房颤动或其他严重心律失常、需要使用主动脉内球囊泵。使用未经校准的脉搏轮廓分析确定每搏量和每搏量变异,并根据使用 250 毫升羟乙基淀粉的预定义算法进行优化。
应用 GDFT 可增加每搏量。干预组接受的胶体比对照组多,晶体比对照组少。总容量替代无差异。两组的总体并发症发生率以及重症监护病房和住院时间相似。GDFT 与谵妄发生率降低相关。干预组的麻醉时间较短。介入手术的持续时间无差异。
干预组的 GDFT 与术后谵妄发生率降低相关。