Modeling stability post zygomatic fracture reconstruction.

Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture repair is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in craniomaxillofacial trauma management. Miniplates and screws are used to stabilize the fractured bone using small local incisions, however, these procedures are not infrequently associated with hardware-related post-operative complications. The amount of fixation hardware utilized varies depending on the fracture pattern and surgical judgment, with three-point fixation being the conventionally accepted treatment. However, limited experimental testing and clinical studies have suggested that ZMC stabilization may be achieved with less than three-point fixation. In this study, we utilized a previously developed finite element modeling approach that allows for detailed bone and muscle representation to study the mechanical behavior of the fractured craniomaxillofacial skeleton (CMFS) under one, two, or three-point fixation of the ZMC. Results suggest that using a miniplate along the infraorbital rim in three-point fixation increases the amount of strain and load transfer to this region, rather than offloading the bone. Two-point (zygomaticomaxillary and zygomaticofrontal) fixation yielded strain patterns most similar to the intact CMFS. One-point (zygomaticofrontal) fixation resulted in higher tensile and compressive strains in the zygomaticofrontal region and the zygomatic arch, along with a higher tensile strain on the zygomatic body. These modeling results provide biomechanical evidence for the concept of over-engineering in the stabilization of facial fractures. Furthermore, they support previous suggestions that less than three-point fixation of ZMC fractures may be adequate to achieve uneventful healing.