Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Erol Olcok Training and Research Hospital, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 1;103(9):e37230. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037230.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease. Immune system cells have an important role in RA. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between disease activity, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) levels in RA patients. We planned to investigate whether these 2 measurements have an advantage over each other. About 67 patients diagnosed with RA and 49 healthy controls included in this study. RA was diagnosed based on 2010 ACR classification criteria. In this cross-sectional study, peripheral blood tests, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemogram, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels were noted after the physical examination of all participants. PIV was calculated with the formula: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count) / lymphocyte count. SII was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × monocytes count) / lymphocyte count. The disease activity score 28 (DAS28) were noted in patients with RA. CRP values of active RA group were significantly higher than remission RA and control groups (P < .001), control and remission RA groups were similar (P = .86). PIV and SII are significantly higher in active RA than remission RA and control (P < .001, P < .001) higher in remission RA than control (P < .001, P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in predicting remission compared to the control group, CRP was not significant, PIV and SII was significant and PIV has higher sensitivity and sensitivity, a PIV value of > 217.31 have sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 85.7%. CRP, PIV, and SII are statistically significant in predicting active RA compared to the remission RA and control group. Our findings show that PIV, and SII are easy, inexpensive and reliable markers predicting remission in RA patients. CRP was not significant compared to remission RA and control group, PIV and SII was significant and PIV has higher sensitivity and specificity than SII in the remission group in RA. Patients with high disease activity, PIV, SII, and CRP levels were effective in showing disease activity compared to RA remission group and healthy controls.
类风湿关节炎(RA)是一种慢性、系统性炎症性疾病。免疫系统细胞在 RA 中起着重要作用。我们的目的是研究 RA 患者疾病活动度、系统性免疫炎症指数(SII)和全免疫炎症值(PIV)水平之间的关系。我们计划研究这两种测量方法是否彼此具有优势。本研究纳入了 67 名确诊为 RA 的患者和 49 名健康对照者。RA 的诊断基于 2010 年 ACR 分类标准。在这项横断面研究中,对所有参与者进行体格检查后,记录外周血检查、C 反应蛋白(CRP)、血常规和红细胞沉降率水平。PIV 是通过以下公式计算得出的:(中性粒细胞计数×血小板计数×单核细胞计数)/淋巴细胞计数。SII 的计算方法如下:(中性粒细胞计数×单核细胞计数)/淋巴细胞计数。RA 患者记录疾病活动评分 28(DAS28)。活跃 RA 组的 CRP 值明显高于缓解 RA 组和对照组(P<.001),而缓解 RA 组和对照组相似(P=.86)。与缓解 RA 组和对照组相比,活跃 RA 患者的 PIV 和 SII 显著升高(P<.001,P<.001),缓解 RA 组高于对照组(P<.001,P<.001)。与对照组相比,预测缓解时,CRP 的受试者工作特征曲线分析无显著意义,而 PIV 和 SII 有显著意义,且 PIV 的敏感性和特异性更高,当 PIV 值>217.31 时,敏感性为 75.0%,特异性为 85.7%。与缓解 RA 组和对照组相比,CRP、PIV 和 SII 在预测活跃 RA 方面均具有统计学意义。我们的研究结果表明,PIV 和 SII 是预测 RA 患者缓解的简便、廉价且可靠的标志物。与缓解 RA 组和对照组相比,CRP 无显著意义,而 PIV 和 SII 有显著意义,且 PIV 在缓解组的敏感性和特异性均高于 SII。与 RA 缓解组和健康对照组相比,高疾病活动度、PIV、SII 和 CRP 水平的患者在显示疾病活动度方面更有效。