• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家八哥是否能察觉到捕食风险?

Do domestic budgerigars perceive predation risk?

机构信息

Jilin Engineering Laboratory for Avian Ecology and Conservation Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.

Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resource Conservation and Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01847-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-024-01847-9
PMID:38429588
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10907484/
Abstract

Predation risk may affect the foraging behavior of birds. However, there has been little research on the ability of domestic birds to perceive predation risk and thus adjust their feeding behavior. In this study, we tested whether domestic budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) perceived predation risk after the presentation of specimens and sounds of sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus), domestic cats (Felis catus), and humans, and whether this in turn influenced their feeding behavior. When exposed to visual or acoustic stimuli, budgerigars showed significantly longer latency to feed under sparrowhawk, domestic cat, and human treatments than with controls. Budgerigars responded more strongly to acoustic stimuli than visual stimuli, and they showed the longest latency to feed and the least number of feeding times in response to sparrowhawk calls. Moreover, budgerigars showed shorter latency to feed and greater numbers of feeding times in response to human voices than to sparrowhawk or domestic cat calls. Our results suggest that domestic budgerigars may identify predation risk through visual or acoustic signals and adjust their feeding behavior accordingly.

摘要

捕食风险可能会影响鸟类的觅食行为。然而,对于家禽是否能够感知捕食风险并相应地调整其觅食行为,目前研究较少。在这项研究中,我们测试了家养虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)在展示雀鹰(Accipiter nisus)、家猫(Felis catus)和人类标本和声音后,是否感知到捕食风险,以及这是否反过来影响它们的进食行为。当暴露于视觉或听觉刺激时,虎皮鹦鹉在雀鹰、家猫和人类处理组中进食的潜伏期明显长于对照组。虎皮鹦鹉对听觉刺激的反应比对视觉刺激的反应更强烈,它们对雀鹰叫声的反应表现出最长的进食潜伏期和最少的进食次数。此外,虎皮鹦鹉对人类声音的进食潜伏期较短,进食次数较多,而对雀鹰或家猫叫声的进食潜伏期较长,进食次数较少。我们的结果表明,家养虎皮鹦鹉可能通过视觉或听觉信号识别捕食风险,并相应地调整其进食行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/10907484/09f6e877afc0/10071_2024_1847_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/10907484/cbff5f1876df/10071_2024_1847_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/10907484/8eb10ee4172e/10071_2024_1847_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/10907484/09f6e877afc0/10071_2024_1847_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/10907484/cbff5f1876df/10071_2024_1847_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/10907484/8eb10ee4172e/10071_2024_1847_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/10907484/09f6e877afc0/10071_2024_1847_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do domestic budgerigars perceive predation risk?家八哥是否能察觉到捕食风险?
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01847-9.
2
Effect of auditory stimuli on conditioned vocal behavior of budgerigars.听觉刺激对虎皮鹦鹉条件性发声行为的影响。
Behav Processes. 2016 Jan;122:87-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
Temporal coherence for pure tones in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans (Homo sapiens).虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)和人类(Homo sapiens)中纯音的时间相干性。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Feb;129(1):52-61. doi: 10.1037/a0038368. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
4
Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)对听觉刺激的感知组织:II. 声音信号
J Comp Psychol. 1987 Dec;101(4):367-381. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.101.4.367.
5
Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)颤声鸣叫中发声元素的声学和感知类别。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Nov;125(4):420-30. doi: 10.1037/a0024396.
6
Behavioral measurements of auditory streaming and build-up by budgerigars ().虎皮鹦鹉()的听觉流和累积行为测量。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Sep;144(3):1508. doi: 10.1121/1.5054297.
7
Temporal coherence for complex signals in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans (Homo sapiens).虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)和人类(Homo sapiens)复杂信号的时间相干性。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 May;129(2):174-80. doi: 10.1037/a0039103. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
8
Auditory pattern discrimination in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)的听觉模式辨别
Behav Processes. 2022 Oct;202:104742. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104742. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
9
Is consonance attractive to budgerigars? No evidence from a place preference study.共鸣对虎皮鹦鹉有吸引力吗?来自偏好位置研究的证据。
Anim Cogn. 2020 Sep;23(5):973-987. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01404-0. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Identification of auditory distance cues by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).斑胸草雀(Taeniopygia guttata)和虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)对听觉距离线索的识别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 May;129(5):3384-92. doi: 10.1121/1.3573982.

本文引用的文献

1
Auditory pattern discrimination in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).虎皮鹦鹉(Melopsittacus undulatus)的听觉模式辨别
Behav Processes. 2022 Oct;202:104742. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104742. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
2
Red Junglefowl Chicks Seek Contact With Humans During Foraging Task.红原鸡雏鸡在觅食任务中会寻求与人类接触。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:675526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675526. eCollection 2021.
3
Visual cues of predation risk outweigh acoustic cues: a field experiment in black-capped chickadees.
视觉捕食风险线索超过声音线索:黑头山雀的野外实验。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Oct 14;287(1936):20202002. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2002. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Can you hear me now? The effect of signal degradation on perceived predator threat in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).你现在能听到我说话吗?信号衰减对黑顶山雀(Poecile atricapillus)感知捕食者威胁的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):193-204. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01433-9. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
5
Evolutionary dynamics in the Anthropocene: Life history and intensity of human contact shape antipredator responses.人类世的进化动态:生活史和人类接触强度塑造了反捕食者反应。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Sep 22;18(9):e3000818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000818. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Our Wild Companions: Domestic cats in the Anthropocene.我们的野生伙伴:人类世的家猫。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun;35(6):477-483. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
7
Rapid evolution in predator-free conservation havens and its effects on endangered species recovery.无捕食者保护区域的快速演变及其对濒危物种恢复的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Feb;35(1):383-385. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13521. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Single target acuity is not higher than grating acuity in a bird, the budgerigar.在虎皮鹦鹉这种鸟类中,单目标视力不高于光栅视力。
Vision Res. 2019 Jul;160:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
Anti-predator behavior in pure and hybrid red-legged partridges.纯血和杂交红腿鹧鸪的抗捕食行为。
Poult Sci. 2019 Aug 1;98(8):3085-3092. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez075.
10
Cognition, personality, and stress in budgerigars, .虎皮鹦鹉的认知、个性与压力
Behav Ecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;28(6):1504-1516. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx116. Epub 2017 Sep 25.