• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗乳腺癌基因筛查试验的成本效益分析。

A cost-benefit analysis of genetic screening test for breast cancer in Iran.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 13833-19967, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12003-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-12003-4
PMID:38429685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10905849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the population- and family history (FH) -based screening for BReast CAncer (BRCA) in Iran, a country where less than 10% of breast cancer cases are attributable to a gene mutation.

METHODS

This was an economic evaluation study. The Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) for genetic screening test strategies in Iranian women older than 30 was calculated. To this end, the monetary value of the test was estimated using the willingness-to-pay (WTP) approach using the contingent valuation method (CVM) by payment card. From a healthcare perspective, direct medical and non-medical costs were considered and a decision model for the strategies was developed to simulate the costs. A one-way sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the analysis. The data were analyzed using Excel 2010.

RESULTS

660 women were included for estimating WTP and 2,176,919 women were considered in the costing model. The cost per genetic screening test for population- and FH-based strategies was $167 and $8, respectively. The monetary value of a genetic screening test was $20 and it was $27 for women with a family history or gene mutation in breast cancer. The BCR for population-based and FH-based screening strategies was 0.12 and 3.37, respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study recommends the implementation of a FH-based strategy instead of a population-based genetic screening strategy in Iran, although a cascade genetic screening test strategy should be evaluated in future studies.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估伊朗基于人群和家族史(FH)的乳腺癌(BRCA)筛查的实施情况,该国不到 10%的乳腺癌病例归因于基因突变。

方法

这是一项经济评估研究。计算了 30 岁以上伊朗女性基因筛查测试策略的收益成本比(BCR)。为此,使用意愿支付(WTP)方法通过支付卡使用条件价值评估法(CVM)估算了测试的货币价值。从医疗保健的角度来看,考虑了直接医疗和非医疗成本,并为策略开发了决策模型以模拟成本。单向敏感性分析评估了分析的稳健性。使用 Excel 2010 分析数据。

结果

纳入了 660 名女性来估算 WTP,考虑了 2176919 名女性的成本模型。基于人群和 FH 的策略的基因筛查测试的成本分别为 167 美元和 8 美元。基因筛查测试的货币价值为 20 美元,具有乳腺癌家族史或基因突变的女性为 27 美元。基于人群和 FH 的筛查策略的 BCR 分别为 0.12 和 3.37。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。

结论

本研究建议在伊朗实施基于 FH 的策略,而不是基于人群的遗传筛查策略,尽管未来的研究应评估级联遗传筛查测试策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9bf/10905849/d9345943717e/12885_2024_12003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9bf/10905849/5c93517ec6bb/12885_2024_12003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9bf/10905849/d9345943717e/12885_2024_12003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9bf/10905849/5c93517ec6bb/12885_2024_12003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9bf/10905849/d9345943717e/12885_2024_12003_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A cost-benefit analysis of genetic screening test for breast cancer in Iran.伊朗乳腺癌基因筛查试验的成本效益分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12003-4.
2
Subjective valuation of Iranian women for screening for gene-related diseases: a case of breast cancer.伊朗女性对基因相关疾病筛查的主观评估:以乳腺癌为例。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15568-0.
3
Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.基于人群的 BRCA1、BRCA2、RAD51C、RAD51D、BRIP1、PALB2 基因突变检测在未选择的普通人群女性中的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jul 1;110(7):714-725. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx265.
4
Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.与基于家族史检测相比,对阿什肯纳兹犹太妇女进行BRCA突变群体筛查的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 30;107(1):380. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju380. Print 2015 Jan.
5
Which BRCA genetic testing programs are ready for implementation in health care? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些BRCA基因检测项目已准备好在医疗保健中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1171-1180. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.29. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of germ-line BRCA testing in women with breast cancer and cascade testing in family members of mutation carriers.BRCA 种系检测在乳腺癌女性患者中的成本效益分析,以及突变携带者家族成员的级联检测。
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):985-994. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.231. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
7
A Multigene Test Could Cost-Effectively Help Extend Life Expectancy for Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer.一种多基因检测可以经济高效地帮助延长有遗传性乳腺癌风险的女性的预期寿命。
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):547-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
The economic evaluation of screening for colorectal cancer: Case of Iran.结直肠癌筛查的经济学评估:以伊朗为例。
Clin Lab. 2013;59(5-6):667-74. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2012.120812.
9
Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Health Technology Assessment.家族性高胆固醇血症的基因检测:卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2022 Aug 23;22(3):1-155. eCollection 2022.
10
Evaluation of Cancer-Based Criteria for Use in Mainstream BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer.基于癌症的标准在乳腺癌患者主流 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因检测中的应用评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194428. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4428.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-benefit analysis of mass prostate cancer screening.大规模前列腺癌筛查的成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 May 5;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00553-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The direct medical cost of breast cancer management in a provincial hospital of Papua New Guinea: A cost of illness study of consecutive patients from 2017 to 2022.巴布亚新几内亚一家省级医院乳腺癌管理的直接医疗成本:2017 年至 2022 年连续患者的疾病成本研究。
J Cancer Policy. 2023 Dec;38:100447. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100447. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
2
Economic burden of breast cancer: a case of Southern Iran.乳腺癌的经济负担:以伊朗南部为例。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Aug 29;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00470-8.
3
Subjective valuation of Iranian women for screening for gene-related diseases: a case of breast cancer.
伊朗女性对基因相关疾病筛查的主观评估:以乳腺癌为例。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15568-0.
4
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tools for Stratifying Women into Risk Groups: A Systematic Review.用于将女性分层为风险组的乳腺癌风险评估工具:一项系统评价。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;15(4):1124. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041124.
5
Estimates and Projections of the Global Economic Cost of 29 Cancers in 204 Countries and Territories From 2020 to 2050.2020 年至 2050 年全球 29 种癌症在 204 个国家和地区的全球经济成本估计和预测。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):465-472. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7826.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.75 岁以上女性筛查性乳房 X 光检查的成本效益:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jan;175(1):11-19. doi: 10.7326/M20-8076. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview.2020年癌症统计数据概述。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588.
8
Trends and timing of risk-reducing mastectomy uptake in unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚未受影响的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 携带者中降低风险的乳房切除术接受率的趋势和时间。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):1900-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.248. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
Novel and recurrent BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations in patients with breast/ovarian cancer: a series from the south of Tunisia.乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中新型及复发性BRCA1/BRCA2种系突变:来自突尼斯南部的系列研究
J Transl Med. 2021 Mar 16;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02772-y.
10
Global incidence and mortality of breast cancer: a trend analysis.全球乳腺癌发病率和死亡率:趋势分析。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Feb 11;13(4):5748-5803. doi: 10.18632/aging.202502.