Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, 1400 Nicholasville Rd., Lexington, KY 40503, USA.
Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, 1400 Nicholasville Rd., Lexington, KY 40503, USA.
Vet Parasitol. 2024 Apr;327:110152. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110152. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
Tapeworm infection in horses can cause serious health concerns, and recent data have documented treatment failures in the most common species, Anoplocephala perfoliata. The threat of anthelmintic resistance in A. perfoliata is of particular concern because of poor diagnostic performance of standard egg counting techniques for detecting this parasite. This study compared the performance of three diagnostic techniques 1) Mini-FLOTAC, 2) Cornell-Wisconsin, and 3) Proudman and Edwards used to detect and quantify A. perfoliata eggs in naturally infected horses. Eighteen adult female horses from the University of Kentucky's historic parasitology herd were included in this study. Fecal samples were collected from all horses at five collection time points two weeks apart and analyzed with the three techniques. A total of 90 samples were collected and 270 counts determined in the study. The proportions of positive samples determined by the three techniques were significantly different from each other (p<0.05): Mini-FLOTAC (16%), Cornell-Wisconsin (47%), and Proudman and Edwards (70%). The Proudman and Edwards technique counted consistently higher numbers of tapeworm eggs compared to the other two techniques throughout the study [p < 0.05]. Total raw counts of tapeworm eggs across the study for each technique were 16, 88, and 410 for the Mini-FLOTAC, Cornell-Wisconsin, and Proudman and Edwards, respectively. This study demonstrated that the Proudman and Edwards technique was superior in diagnosing A. perfoliata infection. Future work needs to assess this technique's potential for Fecal Egg Count Reduction Testing (FECRT).
马的带绦虫感染可能会导致严重的健康问题,最近的数据记录了最常见的物种阿苯达唑的治疗失败。阿苯达唑对驱虫药耐药性的威胁尤其令人担忧,因为标准的卵计数技术对检测这种寄生虫的诊断性能不佳。本研究比较了三种诊断技术 1)Mini-FLOTAC、2)康奈尔-威斯康星和 3)Proudman 和 Edwards 用于检测和量化自然感染马中的阿苯达唑的性能。本研究纳入了肯塔基大学历史寄生虫学畜群的 18 头成年雌性马。从所有马匹采集粪便样本,每两周采集一次,共采集 5 次,用三种技术进行分析。共采集了 90 个样本,确定了 270 个计数。三种技术确定的阳性样本比例彼此显著不同(p<0.05):Mini-FLOTAC(16%)、康奈尔-威斯康星(47%)和 Proudman 和 Edwards(70%)。在整个研究过程中,Proudman 和 Edwards 技术与其他两种技术相比,计数的绦虫卵数量始终更高 [p < 0.05]。在整个研究中,每种技术的绦虫卵总原始计数分别为 Mini-FLOTAC 的 16、88 和 410、康奈尔-威斯康星和 Proudman 和 Edwards。本研究表明,Proudman 和 Edwards 技术在诊断阿苯达唑感染方面具有优势。未来的工作需要评估该技术在粪便卵计数减少测试(FECRT)中的潜力。