Tele-Electrocardiography Division, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Electrocardiol. 2024 May-Jun;84:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.02.007. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Accurate estimation of accessory pathway (AP) localization in patients with ventricular pre-excitation or Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome remains a diagnostic challenge. Existing algorithms have contributed significantly to this area, but alternative algorithms can offer additional perspectives and approaches to AP localization.
This study introduces and evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the EPM algorithm in AP localization, comparing it with established algorithms Arruda and EASY.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 138 patients from Hospital São Paulo who underwent catheter ablation. Three blinded examiners assessed the EPM algorithm's diagnostic accuracy against the Arruda and EASY algorithms. The gold standard for comparison was the radioscopic position of the AP where radiofrequency ablation led to pre-excitation disappearance on the ECG.
EPM showed a diagnostic accuracy of 51.45%, closely aligning with Arruda (53.29%) and EASY (44.69%). Adjacency accuracy for EPM was 70.67%, with Arruda at 66.18% and EASY at 72.22%. Sensitivity for EPM in distinguishing left vs. right APs was 95.73%, with a specificity of 74.33%. For identifying septal vs. lateral right APs, EPM sensitivity was 82.79% with a specificity of 46.15%. These measures were comparable to those of Arruda and EASY. Inter-observer variability was excellent for EPM, with Kappa statistics over 0.9.
The EPM algorithm emerges as a reliable tool for AP localization, offering a systematic approach beneficial for therapeutic decision-making in electrophysiology. Its comparable diagnostic accuracy and excellent inter-observer variability underscore its potential clinical applicability. Future research may further validate its efficacy in a broader clinical setting.
在心室预激或沃-帕-怀(Wolff-Parkinson-White,WPW)综合征患者中,准确估计旁路(Accessory Pathway,AP)的定位仍然是一个诊断挑战。现有的算法在这方面做出了重要贡献,但替代算法可以为 AP 定位提供额外的视角和方法。
本研究介绍并评估了 EPM 算法在 AP 定位中的诊断准确性,并将其与已建立的 Arruda 和 EASY 算法进行比较。
对圣保罗医院接受导管消融的 138 例患者进行回顾性分析。三位盲法检查者评估了 EPM 算法与 Arruda 和 EASY 算法相比的诊断准确性。比较的金标准是 AP 的放射位置,射频消融导致心电图上预激消失。
EPM 的诊断准确性为 51.45%,与 Arruda(53.29%)和 EASY(44.69%)相近。EPM 的毗邻准确性为 70.67%,Arruda 为 66.18%,EASY 为 72.22%。EPM 区分左 AP 与右 AP 的敏感性为 95.73%,特异性为 74.33%。对于鉴别右侧间隔与外侧 AP,EPM 的敏感性为 82.79%,特异性为 46.15%。这些指标与 Arruda 和 EASY 相当。EPM 的观察者间变异性极好,Kappa 统计值大于 0.9。
EPM 算法是一种可靠的 AP 定位工具,提供了一种系统的方法,有利于电生理治疗决策。其可比的诊断准确性和极好的观察者间变异性突出了其潜在的临床适用性。未来的研究可能会进一步验证其在更广泛的临床环境中的疗效。