Suppr超能文献

结直肠腹膜转移患者行细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)后,COMPASS 和 BIOSCOPE 预后评分的外部验证。

External validation of COMPASS and BIOSCOPE prognostic scores in colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

机构信息

Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Dept. of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;49(3):604-610. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.007. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The selection of patients undergoing cytoreductive- surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is crucial. BIOSCOPE and COMPASS are prognostic scores designed to stratify survival into four classes according to clinical and pathological features. The purpose of this study is to analyze the prognostic role of these scores using a large cohort of patients as an external reference.

METHODS

Overall survival analysis was performed using Log-Rank and Kaplan-Meier curves for each score. The probability of survival at 12, 36, and 60 months was tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

From the validation cohort of 437 patients, the analysis included 410 patients in the COMPASS group and 364 patients in the BIOSCOPE group (100% data completeness). We observed a different patient distribution between classes (high-risk for BIOSCOPE compared to COMPASS, p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, both COMPASS and BIOSCOPE effectively stratified overall survival (Log-Rank, p = 0.0001 in both cases), with a lack of discrimination between COMPASS classes II and III (p = n.s.). COMPASS at 12 m and BIOSCOPE at 60 m showed the best performance in terms of survival prediction (AUC of 0.82 and 0.81). The specificity of the two tests is good (median 81.3%), whereas sensibility is quite low (median 64.2%).

CONCLUSION

Following external validation in a large population of patients with CRC-PM who are eligible for surgery, the COMPASS and BIOSCOPE scores exhibit high inter-test variability but effectively stratify cancer-related mortality risk. While the quality of the scores is similar, BIOSCOPE shows better inter-tier differentiation, suggesting that tumor molecular classification could improve test discrimination capability. More powerful stratification scores with the inclusion of novel predictors are needed.

摘要

简介

选择接受细胞减灭术(CRS)加腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)治疗的患者至关重要。BIOSCOPE 和 COMPASS 是两种预后评分系统,它们根据临床和病理特征将生存率分为四个等级。本研究的目的是使用大型患者队列作为外部参考,分析这些评分的预后作用。

方法

使用 Log-Rank 和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线对每个评分进行总生存分析。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线测试 12、36 和 60 个月的生存概率,以确定灵敏度和特异性。

结果

从验证队列的 437 名患者中,分析包括 COMPASS 组的 410 名患者和 BIOSCOPE 组的 364 名患者(100%数据完整性)。我们观察到不同的 CLASS 之间存在不同的患者分布(与 COMPASS 相比,BIOSCOPE 为高危,p=0.0001)。然而,COMPASS 和 BIOSCOPE 都有效地对总生存率进行了分层(Log-Rank,p=0.0001,两种情况均如此),COMPASS 等级 II 和 III 之间缺乏区分(p=n.s.)。在 12 个月时的 COMPASS 和在 60 个月时的 BIOSCOPE 在生存预测方面表现最佳(AUC 为 0.82 和 0.81)。两种测试的特异性都很好(中位数为 81.3%),而敏感性相当低(中位数为 64.2%)。

结论

在经过大量可手术治疗的结直肠癌腹膜转移(CRC-PM)患者的外部验证后,COMPASS 和 BIOSCOPE 评分显示出较高的测试间变异性,但有效地分层了癌症相关死亡率风险。虽然评分的质量相似,但 BIOSCOPE 显示出更好的分层区分度,这表明肿瘤分子分类可以提高测试的区分能力。需要更强大的分层评分,并纳入新的预测因子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验