• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别差异对冠状动脉介入治疗桡动脉远端入路可行性和安全性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。

Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Institut Català de la Salut.

Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardíaca, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida Fundació Dr. Pifarré, IRBLleida, Lleida.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2024 Aug 1;35(5):360-367. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348
PMID:38433727
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures.

METHODS

This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P  < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 mm; P  < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mm; P  = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P  = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P  = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P  < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.

摘要

背景

与男性相比,女性经桡动脉入路行传统介入治疗的成功率较低,且痉挛发生率较高。迄今为止,性别对远端桡动脉入路(DRA)性能的影响尚未完全阐明。本研究旨在评估性别对 DRA 操作的导管插入成功率和其他性能参数的影响。

方法

这是一项前瞻性的三中心观察性研究。2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 9 月,连续收集所有接受 DRA 行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者数据。

结果

共登记了 868 例手术,并根据性别分为两组:女性(n=258)和男性(n=610)。与男性患者相比,女性患者的基线特征较差,表现为无脉或弱脉(29%比 17%;P<0.001)、桡动脉远端直径(2.2±0.3 毫米比 2.4±0.4 毫米;P<0.001)和桡动脉近端直径(2.5±0.7 毫米比 2.7±0.7 毫米;P=0.001)。女性患者的成功率与男性患者无差异(94.2%比 96.6%;P=0.135),但女性患者动脉痉挛的发生率更高(5.8%比 3.0%;P=0.044)。术前超声评估是 DRA 成功的唯一预测因素[比值比=20.0(4.739-83.333);P<0.001]。

结论

在接受冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,DRA 的成功率较高,无论性别如何,女性患者的动脉痉挛发生率较高。

相似文献

1
Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study.性别差异对冠状动脉介入治疗桡动脉远端入路可行性和安全性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Coron Artery Dis. 2024 Aug 1;35(5):360-367. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001348. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial.远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中的比较:DISCO RADIAL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Distal Radial Access for Coronary Procedures in a Large Prospective Multicenter Registry: The KODRA Trial.大样本前瞻性多中心注册研究:经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗(KODRA 试验)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb 12;17(3):329-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.021.
4
Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention: Design and Rationale of the DIPRA Trial.经桡动脉入路的远端桡动脉与近端桡动脉在心脏导管检查和介入治疗中的比较:DIPRA 试验的设计和原理。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Feb;35:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
5
Distal Radiation Access as an Alternative to Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (According to TENDERA Trial).远端桡动脉入路作为冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中传统桡动脉入路的替代方案(基于TENDERA试验)
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Apr;48(4):101546. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101546. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
6
Distal Radial Artery Access in comparison to Forearm Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DARFORA Trial).经桡动脉(尺骨茎突附近)途径入路与经前臂桡动脉途径入路行心导管术的对比:一项随机对照试验(DARFORA 试验)。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;2022:7698583. doi: 10.1155/2022/7698583. eCollection 2022.
7
Distal radial approach versus conventional radial approach: a comparative study of feasibility and safety.远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路:可行性和安全性的对比研究。
Libyan J Med. 2021 Dec;16(1):1830600. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2020.1830600.
8
The Comparison of Traditional Radial Access and Novel Distal Radial Access for Cardiac Catheterization.传统桡动脉入路与新型桡动脉远心端入路用于心脏导管插入术的比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Apr;21(4):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
Distal Transradial Access For Cardiac Catheterization in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.经皮桡动脉远端入路在血液透析患者心导管检查中的应用。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Aug;34(8):E627-E632. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00386.
10
Early Clinical Experience With Right and Left Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox in 52 Consecutive Patients.52例连续患者在解剖鼻烟壶区行左右桡动脉远端入路的早期临床经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jun;30(6):218-223. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Distal radial access in interventional cardiology: technique, pitfalls and recommendations.介入心脏病学中的桡动脉远端入路:技术、陷阱与建议。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025 Jun 30;15(3):665-683. doi: 10.21037/cdt-2025-66. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
[Distal radial access for coronary procedures in an all-comer population: the first 1000 patients in a prospective cohort].[全人群冠状动脉手术的桡动脉远端入路:前瞻性队列中的前1000例患者]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 Oct 15;6(4):287-295. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000473. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
Distal versus proximal radial access in coronary angiography: a meta-analysis.
冠状动脉造影中桡动脉远端与近端入路:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02505-3.