Suppr超能文献

比较水牙线和牙线在减少成年人牙菌斑方面的效果:一项系统综述。

Comparing the effectiveness of water flosser and dental floss in plaque reduction among adults: A systematic review.

作者信息

Mohapatra Subhashree, Rajpurohit Ladusingh, Mohandas Rahul, Patil Sujeet

机构信息

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Nov-Dec;27(6):559-567. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_597_22. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interdental aids such as dental floss and water flossers have been found to be effective in removing interdental plaque. This systematic review aimed to compare the available data on the efficacy of dental floss and water flossers in plaque removal among adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Lilac, and Google Scholar were searched from January 1, 2002, to October 31, 2022, to obtain the relevant articles. Based on the search strategy, the titles of the studies were screened independently by two reviewers. Randomized controlled trials were included in the review, in which the study participants were given either dental floss or water flosser. Reduction in plaque scores was the outcome that was assessed. Seven articles met the eligibility criteria and were further processed for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

The majority of the studies favored water flossers over dental floss in plaque reduction. Water flosser was also found to be effective in removing plaque from inaccessible interproximal areas of the tooth surfaces as compared to dental floss.

CONCLUSION

Based on the scope of this review, results suggest that water flossers can be used as an effective alternative to dental floss in patients with manual dexterity, patients undergoing orthodontic treatment, and patients with dental prostheses.

摘要

引言

牙线和水牙线等牙间隙清洁辅助工具已被证明在清除牙间隙菌斑方面有效。本系统评价旨在比较牙线和水牙线在成人清除菌斑功效方面的现有数据。

材料与方法

检索了五个数据库:PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、ScienceDirect、Lilac和谷歌学术,检索时间为2002年1月1日至2022年10月31日,以获取相关文章。根据检索策略,两名评审员独立筛选研究标题。纳入本评价的为随机对照试验,其中研究参与者被给予牙线或水牙线。评估的结果是菌斑评分的降低。七篇文章符合纳入标准,并进一步进行定性分析。

结果

大多数研究表明,在减少菌斑方面,水牙线优于牙线。与牙线相比,水牙线在清除牙齿表面难以触及的邻面区域的菌斑方面也很有效。

结论

基于本评价的范围,结果表明,对于手部灵活性欠佳的患者、正在接受正畸治疗的患者以及佩戴假牙的患者,水牙线可作为牙线的有效替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1523/10906797/34fe3947bd22/JISP-27-559-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验