Badahdah Arwa, Hariri Murooj Abdulrahim, Aljohani Modi Salman, Alshehri Layan Saad, Natto Zuhair S
Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Restorative Dentistry Department, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah 23325, Saudi Arabia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;13(4):396. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040396.
This review aimed to compare the effectiveness of using a dental water jet (WJ) to manual tooth brushing (MTB) alone or when combined with flossing (MTB + F) in improving plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), and gingival index (GI) in regular and orthodontic patients. This review was registered with the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022296752). Three reviewers conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 1990 and July 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials, excluding those involving peri-implantitis, patients with impaired manual dexterity, or powered brushes. The outcomes of interest (PI, BI, and GI) were measured across short-, intermediate-, and long-term periods. Eighteen RCTs were included in this review. PI: in regular patients, use of a WJ showed no additional improvement over flossing, and the results were inconsistent when compared to MTB alone. For orthodontic patients, use of a WJ provided a slight improvement over flossing in the short term and MTB alone in the intermediate term. BI: use of a WJ demonstrated a slight improvement over flossing and MTB alone in both patient groups at different time points. GI: use of a WJ was comparable to flossing but showed slight benefits over MTB alone in the short term for regular patients and in the intermediate term for orthodontic patients. use of a WJ may provide slight benefits in BI and GI compared to flossing or MTB alone, especially for orthodontic patients. incorporating a WJ into the daily oral hygiene routine is recommended due to its potential benefits over brushing alone and its user-friendly alternative to flossing.
本综述旨在比较使用口腔冲洗器(WJ)与单独使用手动刷牙(MTB)或与牙线联合使用(MTB + F)在改善普通患者和正畸患者的菌斑指数(PI)、出血指数(BI)和牙龈指数(GI)方面的效果。本综述已在PROSPERO注册库(CRD42022296752)登记。三位评审员对MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术进行了全面检索,以查找1990年至2022年7月期间发表的研究。符合条件的研究为随机临床试验,排除那些涉及种植体周围炎、手动灵活性受损患者或电动牙刷的研究。在短期、中期和长期内测量了感兴趣的结果(PI、BI和GI)。本综述纳入了18项随机对照试验。PI:在普通患者中,使用口腔冲洗器与使用牙线相比没有额外的改善,与单独使用手动刷牙相比结果不一致。对于正畸患者,使用口腔冲洗器在短期内比使用牙线有轻微改善,在中期比单独使用手动刷牙有轻微改善。BI:在不同时间点,使用口腔冲洗器在两个患者组中均比单独使用牙线和手动刷牙有轻微改善。GI:使用口腔冲洗器与使用牙线相当,但在短期内对普通患者和中期对正畸患者比单独使用手动刷牙有轻微益处。与单独使用牙线或手动刷牙相比,使用口腔冲洗器可能在BI和GI方面有轻微益处,特别是对于正畸患者。由于其相对于单独刷牙的潜在益处以及作为牙线的用户友好替代方法,建议将口腔冲洗器纳入日常口腔卫生常规。