George Emma, Jameel Sarah, Attrill Stacie, Tetali Shailaja, Watson Erin, Yadav Lalit, Sood Sanjay, Srinivasan Varadharajan, Murthy Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana, John Oommen, Grills Nathan
School of Allied Health Science and Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, India.
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Jun;30(6):e1667-e1676. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0609. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
Telehealth in India is growing rapidly and represents a strategy to promote affordable, inclusive, timely and safe access to healthcare. Yet there is a risk that telehealth increases inequity due to the digital divide and existing poor health literacy. A scoping review was conducted to explore use of telehealth in India during and following the COVID-19 pandemic by people with disabilities to inform strategies to increase equity of telehealth for people with disabilities. Of 1966 studies from the initial search in four databases and three specific telehealth journals, 20 sources met the inclusion criteria, limited to a focus on physical disability in India. Findings showed examples of how people with disabilities can exercise increased control in the timing of appointments, convenience of receiving services from home and not having to travel to clinics or hospitals, and platform preference through tools and applications already familiar to them. Carers and families of people with disabilities were described as highly valued stakeholders with important roles in the uptake and effectiveness of telehealth for people with disabilities. The identified benefits of telehealth resulted in high levels of user satisfaction due to increased control and convenience, however, systemic barriers for accessibility remain. This review suggested that if telehealth is not designed intentionally to change the status quo for people with disabilities and prioritize equity, then the benefits may not be sustainable. Recommendations for telehealth India are provided, based on both findings from the literature and analysis of results.
印度的远程医疗正在迅速发展,是一种促进人们以可承受、包容、及时且安全的方式获得医疗保健的策略。然而,由于数字鸿沟和现有的健康素养低下,远程医疗存在加剧不平等的风险。开展了一项范围综述,以探讨在新冠疫情期间及之后印度残疾人对远程医疗的使用情况,为提高残疾人远程医疗公平性的策略提供信息。在对四个数据库和三本特定远程医疗期刊进行初步检索得到的1966项研究中,有20篇文献符合纳入标准,且仅限于关注印度的身体残疾情况。研究结果显示了一些实例,说明残疾人如何能够在预约时间上获得更多掌控权,在家中接受服务的便利性以及无需前往诊所或医院,以及通过他们已经熟悉的工具和应用程序来选择平台。残疾人的护理人员和家人被描述为非常重要的利益相关者,在残疾人远程医疗的采用和效果方面发挥着重要作用。远程医疗的已确定益处因掌控权增加和便利性提高而带来了较高的用户满意度,然而,可及性方面的系统性障碍仍然存在。这项综述表明,如果远程医疗的设计并非有意改变残疾人的现状并优先考虑公平性,那么这些益处可能无法持续。基于文献研究结果和结果分析,为印度的远程医疗提供了建议。