Suppr超能文献

本科生物学教育中学生解决问题方法的差异。

Variations in Student Approaches to Problem Solving in Undergraduate Biology Education.

机构信息

Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866.

Department of Biology, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Jun;23(2):ar12. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-02-0033.

Abstract

Existing research has investigated student problem-solving strategies across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; however, there is limited work in undergraduate biology education on how various aspects that influence learning combine to generate holistic approaches to problem solving. Through the lens of situated cognition, we consider problem solving as a learning phenomenon that involves the interactions between internal cognition of the learner and the external learning environment. Using phenomenography as a methodology, we investigated undergraduate student approaches to problem solving in biology through interviews. We identified five aspects of problem solving (including knowledge, strategy, intention, metacognition, and mindset) that define three qualitatively different approaches to problem solving; each approach is distinguishable by variations across the aspects. Variations in the knowledge and strategy aspects largely aligned with previous work on how the use or avoidance of biological knowledge informed both concept-based and nonconcept-based strategies. Variations in the other aspects revealed intentions spanning complete disengagement to deep interest with the course material, different degrees of metacognitive reflections, and a continuum of fixed to growth mindsets. We discuss implications for how these characterizations can improve instruction and efforts to support development of problem-solving skills.

摘要

现有研究已经调查了科学、技术、工程和数学领域的学生解决问题的策略;然而,在本科生物学教育中,关于影响学习的各个方面如何结合起来形成整体解决问题的方法的研究有限。通过情境认知的视角,我们将问题解决视为一种学习现象,涉及学习者内部认知和外部学习环境之间的相互作用。我们使用现象学作为一种方法,通过访谈调查了本科生在生物学中解决问题的方法。我们确定了问题解决的五个方面(包括知识、策略、意图、元认知和思维模式),这些方面定义了三种不同的问题解决方法;每种方法都可以通过各个方面的变化来区分。知识和策略方面的变化在很大程度上与之前关于如何使用或避免生物学知识来告知基于概念和非基于概念的策略的工作一致。其他方面的变化揭示了从完全不参与到对课程材料深感兴趣的意图,不同程度的元认知反思,以及从固定思维模式到成长思维模式的连续体。我们讨论了这些特征如何能够改善教学以及支持解决问题技能发展的努力的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8859/11235106/7381eae9f88b/cbe-23-ar12-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验