van den Brink Gertrude, Koggel Lieke M, Hendriks Joris Jh, de Boer Mark Gj, Siersema Peter D, Numans Mattijs E
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0252. Print 2024 Oct.
Owing to increasing antibiotic resistance, the worldwide efficacy of (HP) eradication treatment has decreased.
To determine antimicrobial resistance of HP in primary care.
DESIGN & SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using real-world routine healthcare data from 80 general practices in the Netherlands.
Patients with International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) codes for gastric symptoms or Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes for acid inhibition in the period 2010-2020 were selected. Main outcomes were antimicrobial resistance of HP, defined as the prescription of a second eradication treatment within 12 months, and clinical remission of gastric symptoms, defined as no usage of acid inhibition 1 year following eradication therapy.
We identified 138 455 patients with gastric symptoms and/or acid inhibition use (mean age 57 years [standard deviation 18.2 years], 43% male). A total of 5224 (4%) patients received an HP eradication treatment. A second treatment was prescribed to 416 (8%) of those patients. From these, 380 patients received amoxicillin-clarithromycin, 16 amoxicillin-metronidazole, and 11 clarithromycin-metronidazole as first regimen and were considered antimicrobial resistant. We observed a 0.8% increment per year of patients requiring a second eradication treatment ( = 0.003, 95% confidence interval = 0.33 to 1.22). After successful eradication, 2329/4808 (48%) patients used acid inhibition compared with 355/416 (85%) patients following treatment failure (<0.001).
Antimicrobial treatment is not successful in almost one-tenth of HP infections in primary care after a first treatment containing clarithromycin and/or metronidazole. Although the treatment failure rate is not as high as reported in secondary care, the increasing trend is concerning and may require revision of the current guidelines.
由于抗生素耐药性增加,全球幽门螺杆菌(HP)根除治疗的疗效有所下降。
确定基层医疗中HP的抗菌药物耐药性。
采用荷兰80家全科诊所的真实世界常规医疗数据进行回顾性队列研究。
选取2010年至2020年期间具有国际初级保健分类(ICPC)胃部症状编码或解剖治疗化学(ATC)抑酸编码的患者。主要结局为HP的抗菌药物耐药性,定义为在12个月内进行第二次根除治疗,以及胃部症状的临床缓解,定义为根除治疗后1年未使用抑酸药物。
我们识别出138455例有胃部症状和/或使用抑酸药物的患者(平均年龄57岁[标准差18.2岁],43%为男性)。共有5224例(4%)患者接受了HP根除治疗。其中416例(8%)患者接受了第二次治疗。在这些患者中,380例患者首次治疗方案为阿莫西林 - 克拉霉素,16例为阿莫西林 - 甲硝唑,11例为克拉霉素 - 甲硝唑,被视为抗菌药物耐药。我们观察到需要进行第二次根除治疗的患者每年增加0.8%(P = 0.003,95%置信区间 = 0.33至1.22)。根除成功后,4808例患者中有2329例(48%)使用了抑酸药物,而治疗失败后的416例患者中有355例(85%)使用了抑酸药物(P<0.001)。
在基层医疗中,首次使用含克拉霉素和/或甲硝唑的治疗后,近十分之一的HP感染抗菌治疗未成功。尽管治疗失败率不像二级医疗中报道的那么高,但上升趋势令人担忧,可能需要修订现行指南。