• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高择期腹疝和切口疝修复手术中的老年患者手术效果:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划研究。

Advancing geriatric surgical outcomes in elective ventral and incisional hernia repair surgeries: An American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program study.

机构信息

Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech Health Science Center El Paso, TX, USA.

Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2024 Jul;233:108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.030
PMID:38443271
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increasing age is known to be associated with increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality, however, the goal of this study was to determine if an increase in age correlates to differences in surgical outcomes for elective ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2016 to 2020. Included diagnosis codes were laparoscopic or open incisional or ventral hernia repairs, categorized into three age groups: 18-64y, 65-74y, and ≥75y. Thirty-day perioperative outcomes analyzed using bivariate χ test and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified 116,643 people who had elective ventral or incisional hernia repair. Compared to 18-64y and 65-74y age groups, patients ≥75y were significantly more likely to develop any post-operative complication, be re-admitted post-operatively for any reason, have an extended hospital stay, and require a reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≥75y have significantly higher rates of perioperative complications after elective hernia repair compared to younger patients.

摘要

引言

众所周知,随着年龄的增长,术后发病率和死亡率的风险也会增加,但本研究的目的是确定年龄的增加是否与择期腹疝修补术的手术结果存在差异有关。

方法

使用美国外科医师学会 NSQIP 数据库进行回顾性队列研究,时间范围为 2016 年至 2020 年。纳入的诊断代码包括腹腔镜或开放式切口或腹疝修复术,并分为三个年龄组:18-64 岁、65-74 岁和≥75 岁。使用双变量 χ 检验和多变量逻辑回归分析 30 天围手术期结果。

结果

我们确定了 116643 例接受择期腹疝或切口疝修复的患者。与 18-64 岁和 65-74 岁年龄组相比,≥75 岁的患者发生任何术后并发症、因任何原因术后再次入院、住院时间延长和需要再次手术的可能性显著更高。

结论

与年轻患者相比,≥75 岁的患者在择期疝修补术后围手术期并发症的发生率明显更高。

相似文献

1
Advancing geriatric surgical outcomes in elective ventral and incisional hernia repair surgeries: An American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program study.提高择期腹疝和切口疝修复手术中的老年患者手术效果:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划研究。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jul;233:108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.030. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study with costs analysis on 269 patients.腹腔镜与开放切口疝修补术:一项对269例患者进行成本分析的回顾性队列研究。
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):609-618. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1601-3. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
National results after ventral hernia repair.腹疝修补术后的全国性结果。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
4
Closing the gap between the laparoscopic and open approaches to abdominal wall hernia repair: a trend and outcomes analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.缩小腹壁疝修补腹腔镜手术与开放手术方法之间的差距:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的趋势与结果分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3267-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4650-7. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
5
Female sex as independent risk factor for chronic pain following elective incisional hernia repair: registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison.女性性别是择期切口疝修补术后慢性疼痛的独立危险因素:基于登记的、倾向评分匹配比较。
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):567-576. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02089-2. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
The effect of smoking on 30-day outcomes in elective hernia repair.吸烟对择期疝修补术 30 天结局的影响。
Am J Surg. 2018 Sep;216(3):471-474. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
7
National trends in ventral hernia repairs for patients with intra-abdominal metastases.全国范围内针对合并腹腔转移患者的腹疝修补术的趋势。
Surgery. 2020 Sep;168(3):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 18.
8
Extending the value of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program claims dataset to study long-term outcomes: Rate of repeat ventral hernia repair.扩展国家外科质量改进计划索赔数据集的价值以研究长期结局:复发性腹疝修补率
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
9
Laparoscopic versus open elective repair of primary umbilical hernias: short-term outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program.腹腔镜与开放选择性修复原发性脐疝:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的短期结果
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):741-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3252-5. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
10
Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States.美国目前腹前壁疝住院治疗的全国实践模式。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4104-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3075-4. Epub 2013 Jul 17.