Suppr超能文献

评估跨专业培训病房对患者满意度和临床结果的影响:一项混合方法分析。

Evaluating the impact of interprofessional training wards on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes: a mixed-methods analysis.

作者信息

Schlosser-Hupf Sophie, Aichner Elisabeth, Meier Marcus, Albaladejo-Fuertes Sheila, Ruttmann Kirstin, Rusch Sophia, Michels Bernhard, Mehrl Alexander, Kunst Claudia, Schmid Stephan, Müller Martina

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology, and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Nursing Development Department of the Care Management Head Office, University Hospital Regensburg, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 20;11:1320027. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1320027. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interprofessional teamwork is pivotal in modern healthcare, prompting the establishment of interprofessional training wards since 1996. While these wards serve as hubs for optimizing healthcare professional collaboration and communication, research into patient outcomes remains notably sparse and geographically limited, predominantly examining patient satisfaction and sparingly exploring other metrics like mortality or self-discharge rates. This study seeks to bridge this gap, comparing patient outcomes in interprofessional training wards and conventional wards under the hypothesis that the former offers no disadvantage to patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We explored patient outcomes within an interprofessional student ward called A-STAR at a University Hospital from October 2019 to December 2022. Engaging with patients discharged between May 2021 and April 2022, we utilized digital and paper-based anonymous questionnaires, catering to patient preference, to gather pertinent data.

RESULTS

Analysis of outcomes for 1,482 A-STAR (interprofessional student ward) and 5,752 conventional ward patients revealed noteworthy findings. A-STAR patients tended to be younger (59 vs. 61 years,  < 0.01) and more frequently male (73.5% vs. 70.4%,  = 0.025). Vital clinical outcomes, such as discharges against medical advice, complication-driven readmissions, and ICU transfers, were statistically similar between groups, as were mortality rates (1.2% vs. 1.3%,  = 0.468). A-STAR demonstrated high patient satisfaction, underscored by positive reflections on team competence, ward atmosphere, and responsiveness to concerns, emphasizing the value placed on interprofessional collaboration. Patient narratives commended team kindness, lucid explanations, and proactive involvement.

DISCUSSION

This data collectively underscores the safety and reliability of patient care within training wards, affirming that patients can trust the care provided in these settings. Patients on the interprofessional ward demonstrated high satisfaction levels: 96.7% appreciated the atmosphere and conduct of ward rounds. In comparison, 98.3% were satisfied with the discussion and information about their treatment during their hospital stay.

摘要

引言

跨专业团队合作在现代医疗保健中至关重要,自1996年以来促使了跨专业培训病房的设立。虽然这些病房是优化医疗保健专业人员协作与沟通的中心,但对患者结局的研究仍然明显稀少且地域有限,主要集中在检查患者满意度,很少探索其他指标,如死亡率或自动出院率。本研究旨在填补这一空白,比较跨专业培训病房和传统病房的患者结局,假设前者对患者结局没有不利影响。

材料与方法

我们于2019年10月至2022年12月在一家大学医院的一个名为A-STAR的跨专业学生病房中探索患者结局。针对2021年5月至2022年4月期间出院的患者,我们根据患者偏好,使用数字和纸质匿名问卷来收集相关数据。

结果

对1482名A-STAR(跨专业学生病房)患者和5752名传统病房患者的结局分析得出了值得注意的结果。A-STAR病房的患者往往更年轻(59岁对61岁,<0.01),男性比例更高(73.5%对70.4%,=0.025)。两组之间的重要临床结局,如违反医嘱出院、并发症导致的再次入院和重症监护病房(ICU)转诊,在统计学上相似,死亡率也是如此(1.2%对1.3%,=0.468)。A-STAR病房患者满意度很高,对团队能力、病房氛围和对问题的响应的积极反馈突出了这一点,强调了跨专业合作的价值。患者的叙述称赞了团队的友善、清晰的解释和积极的参与。

讨论

这些数据共同强调了培训病房内患者护理的安全性和可靠性,证实患者可以信任这些环境中提供的护理。跨专业病房的患者满意度很高:96.7%的患者赞赏病房的氛围和查房行为。相比之下,98.3%的患者对住院期间关于其治疗的讨论和信息感到满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c6/10912604/a6efd18e776b/fmed-11-1320027-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验