Mohammed Bahaa El-Din Abdallah, Abd El Khaliq Hendy Khaled, Elghetany Mohamed Raafat, Abouelnour Ahmed, Mohamed Ali Mohamed, Akram El-Awady Ahmed, Ahmed Hussein Farouk
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 3;16(2):e53527. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53527. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Objective To assess pain intensity levels during orthodontic therapy of Class II malocclusion patients undergoing skeletally anchored maxillary molar distalization assisted with different micro-osteoperforation (MOP) approaches. Methods Twenty-seven patients (12 males and 18 females) with a mean age of 16.1 ± 0.3 years were randomized into three equal groups (n=9): Group 1 comprised MOPs on buccal surface, Group 2 comprised MOPs on buccal and palatal surface, and Group 3 comprised the control or no-MOP group. The patients underwent maxillary molar distalization using skeletally anchored distal jet appliance assisted with or without MOPs. The MOPs were applied repeatedly on the buccal and buccal and palatal sides, or no MOP (control). Pain intensity was assessed using a 10 cm visual analog scale after each device activation at 24, 48, 72 hours, and at seven days. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA for non-paired and paired means. Results Both approaches of buccal and buccal and palatal application of MOPs showed statistically significant (p< 0.01) higher levels of pain intensity after the first activation at 24 hours. Nevertheless, pain intensity levels decreased significantly in both MOP groups and between the two activations. Conclusion The repeated application of MOPs on either the buccal side only or on both buccal and palatal sides during maxillary molar distalization did not affect the levels of pain experienced; however, these levels were reported to be higher than that obtained in the control group. Moreover, it is observed that these pain levels tend to gradually reduce to mild levels over the subsequent days.
目的 评估在不同微骨穿孔(MOP)方法辅助下,进行骨骼锚固上颌磨牙远移的安氏II类错牙合患者正畸治疗期间的疼痛强度水平。方法 将27例平均年龄为16.1±0.3岁的患者(12例男性和18例女性)随机分为三组,每组9例:第1组为颊侧微骨穿孔组,第2组为颊侧和腭侧微骨穿孔组,第3组为对照组或无微骨穿孔组。患者使用骨骼锚固远移矫治器进行上颌磨牙远移,辅助或不辅助微骨穿孔。在颊侧、颊侧和腭侧反复进行微骨穿孔,或不进行微骨穿孔(对照)。在每次装置激活后24、48、72小时及7天时,使用10厘米视觉模拟量表评估疼痛强度。使用单因素方差分析和重复测量方差分析对非配对和配对均值数据进行分析。结果 在24小时首次激活后,颊侧及颊侧和腭侧应用微骨穿孔的两种方法均显示疼痛强度水平在统计学上显著更高(p<0.01)。然而,两个微骨穿孔组的疼痛强度水平在两次激活之间均显著降低。结论 在上颌磨牙远移过程中,仅在颊侧或颊侧和腭侧反复应用微骨穿孔并不影响所经历的疼痛水平;然而,据报道这些水平高于对照组。此外,观察到这些疼痛水平在随后几天倾向于逐渐减轻至轻度水平。