Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024 May;59(9):1134-1143. doi: 10.1111/apt.17934. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on otolaryngologist's assessment of laryngoscopic findings remains contentious in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
To evaluate GERD prevalence, applying Lyon 2.0 Consensus criteria, in patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms undergoing laryngoscopic examination and impedance-pH monitoring.
In this retrospective assessment, we included 470 patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms, either isolated or combined with typical symptoms, who had been referred to six tertiary Italian Gastroenterology Units between January and December 2020. Of these, 274 underwent 24-h impedance-pH monitoring and laryngoscopy off PPI therapy. GERD diagnosis followed Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria, incorporating mean nocturnal baseline impedance when pH-impedance monitoring was inconclusive.
Laryngoscopic examination revealed pathological findings (predominantly posterior laryngitis) in 71.2% (195/274). GERD was diagnosed in 29.2% (80/274) via impedance-pH monitoring. The prevalence of GERD in patients with positive or negative laryngoscopy was similar (32.3% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.075). No significant difference in proximal reflux occurrences was noted between positive and negative laryngoscopy groups (33.3% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.133). Laryngoscopy demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 78.8% and 32.0%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 32.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 28.4%. In contrast, a threshold of four concurrent laryngoscopic signs, identified in only eight patients, demonstrated a PPV of 93.8% and a NPV of 73.6% (sensitivity 25.4%, specificity 99.2%).
This study underscores the limited diagnostic accuracy of laryngoscopy, emphasising the necessity of impedance-pH monitoring for confirming GERD diagnoses using Lyon 2.0 criteria in patients with suspected extra-oesophageal symptoms.
根据耳鼻喉科医生对喉镜检查结果的评估,胃食管反流病(GERD)的诊断在敏感性和特异性方面仍存在争议。
应用 Lyon 2.0 共识标准,评估行喉镜检查和阻抗-pH 监测的食管外症状患者中 GERD 的患病率。
在这项回顾性评估中,我们纳入了 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间,来自意大利六个三级胃肠病学单位的 470 名食管外症状患者(单纯或合并典型症状)。其中 274 名患者在停质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗下行 24 小时阻抗-pH 监测和喉镜检查。GERD 诊断采用 Lyon 共识 2.0 标准,当 pH-阻抗监测结果不确定时纳入平均夜间基线阻抗。
喉镜检查显示 71.2%(274 例中有 195 例)存在病理表现(主要为后喉炎)。通过阻抗-pH 监测诊断 GERD 的患者占 29.2%(274 例中有 80 例)。喉镜检查阳性和阴性患者中 GERD 的患病率相似(32.3%比 21.5%,p=0.075)。阳性和阴性喉镜检查组近端反流的发生率无显著差异(33.3%比 24.1%,p=0.133)。喉镜检查的敏感性和特异性分别为 78.8%和 32.0%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 32.3%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 28.4%。相比之下,仅在 8 名患者中发现的 4 个同时存在的喉镜征象的阈值,PPV 为 93.8%,NPV 为 73.6%(敏感性 25.4%,特异性 99.2%)。
本研究强调了喉镜检查的诊断准确性有限,提示在疑似食管外症状患者中,使用 Lyon 2.0 标准,阻抗-pH 监测对于 GERD 诊断的确认是必要的。