Rosenson Robert S, Rader Daniel J, Ali Shazia, Banerjee Poulabi, McGinniss Jennifer, Pordy Robert
Metabolism and Lipids Unit, Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Department of Genetics and Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Mar 6. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07567-z.
Natural selection (Mendelian randomization) studies support a causal relationship between elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of evinacumab in reducing TRLs in patient cohorts from three separate clinical trials with evinacumab.
Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 70 mg/dL were enrolled in a phase III trial (R1500-CL-1629; NCT03399786). Patients diagnosed with refractory hypercholesterolemia, with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL or ≥ 100 mg/dL for those with or without ASCVD, respectively, were enrolled in a phase II trial (R1500-CL-1643; NCT03175367). Patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia (fasting TGs ≥ 500 mg/dL) were enrolled in a phase II trial (R1500-HTG-1522; NCT03452228). Patients received evinacumab intravenously (5 or 15 mg/kg) every 4 weeks, or subcutaneously (300 or 450 mg) every week or every 2 weeks. Efficacy outcomes included change in TRLs (calculated as total cholesterol minus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol minus LDL-C) and other lipid parameters from baseline to 12, 16, or 24 weeks for trial 1522, 1643, and 1629, respectively.
At baseline, TRL levels were higher for patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia entering the 1522 trial vs. other cohorts. Reductions in TRLs were observed across all studies with evinacumab, with > 50% reduction from baseline observed at the highest doses evaluated in patients with HoFH or refractory hypercholesterolemia. Within all three trials, evinacumab was generally well tolerated.
Despite limitations in direct comparisons between study groups, these data indicate that TRL levels could be a future target for lipid-lowering therapies.
自然选择(孟德尔随机化)研究支持富含甘油三酯的脂蛋白(TRL)升高与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)之间存在因果关系。这项事后分析评估了依维那单抗在三项使用依维那单抗的独立临床试验患者队列中降低TRL的疗效。
纯合子家族性高胆固醇血症(HoFH)且低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)≥70mg/dL的患者参加了一项III期试验(R1500-CL-1629;NCT03399786)。诊断为难治性高胆固醇血症、LDL-C≥70mg/dL(无ASCVD者)或≥100mg/dL(有ASCVD者)的患者参加了一项II期试验(R1500-CL-1643;NCT03175367)。严重高甘油三酯血症(空腹甘油三酯≥500mg/dL)患者参加了一项II期试验(R1500-HTG-1522;NCT03452228)。患者每4周静脉注射依维那单抗(5或15mg/kg),或每周或每2周皮下注射(300或450mg)。疗效指标包括试验1522、1643和1629中分别从基线到12、16或24周时TRL的变化(计算方法为总胆固醇减去高密度脂蛋白胆固醇减去LDL-C)以及其他血脂参数。
在基线时,进入1522试验的严重高甘油三酯血症患者的TRL水平高于其他队列。在所有使用依维那单抗的研究中均观察到TRL降低,在HoFH或难治性高胆固醇血症患者中,在评估的最高剂量下观察到TRL从基线降低>50%。在所有三项试验中,依维那单抗总体耐受性良好。
尽管研究组之间的直接比较存在局限性,但这些数据表明TRL水平可能是未来降脂治疗的一个靶点。