Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Physiotherapy. 2024 Jun;123:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
To determine the efficacy of two physiotherapeutic interventions - aquatic therapy (AT) and land-based therapy (LBT) - for reducing pain in women with fibromyalgia.
Single-blind, randomised controlled, equivalence trial.
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Association in A Coruña, Spain.
Forty women with fibromyalgia were assigned at random in a 1:1 manner to two groups: AT (n = 20) and LBT (n = 20).
Two therapeutic exercise programmes, with 60-min sessions, were undertaken three times per week for 12 weeks. Sessions were carried out in groups by a trained physiotherapist.
The primary outcome was pain intensity (visual analogue scale). The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold (algometer), quality of life (Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory) and physical ability (6-Minute Walk Test). Patients were evaluated at baseline, 12 weeks (post-treatment) and 18 weeks (follow-up). The statistical analysis was per-protocol. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate significance. Effect size was calculated.
The mean age was 50 [standard deviation (SD) 9] years, with median body mass index of 27 [interquartile range (IQR) 25-30] kg/m and median symptom duration of 11 (IQR 6-15) years. No differences were observed between the groups post-treatment, but differences in favour of AT were found in pain intensity [2.7 (IQR 1.5-4.9) vs 5.5 (IQR 3.3-7.6); p= 0.023; large effect, Cohen's d= 0.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-1.5] and sleep quality [12.0 (IQR 7.3-15.3) vs 15.0 (IQR 13.0-17.0); p= 0.030; large effect, Cohen's d= 0.8; 95% CI 0.1-1.5] at follow-up.
The results suggest that AT is better than LBT for reducing pain intensity and improving sleep quality after 6 weeks of follow-up. AT may be a good treatment option for women with fibromyalgia.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02695875 CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
确定两种物理治疗干预措施——水中治疗(AT)和陆地治疗(LBT)在减轻纤维肌痛女性疼痛方面的疗效。
单盲、随机对照、等效性试验。
西班牙拉科鲁尼亚的纤维肌痛、慢性疲劳综合征和多种化学敏感协会。
40 名纤维肌痛女性被随机分为两组,每组 20 人:AT 组和 LBT 组。
两组均接受 60 分钟的治疗运动方案,每周 3 次,共 12 周。由经过培训的物理治疗师以小组形式进行治疗。
主要结局为疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分)。次要结局包括压痛阈值(压力计)、生活质量(修订纤维肌痛影响问卷)、睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)、疲劳(多维疲劳量表)和身体能力(6 分钟步行测试)。患者在基线、12 周(治疗后)和 18 周(随访)进行评估。统计分析是基于方案进行的。p<0.05 表示差异有统计学意义。计算了效应量。
平均年龄为 50 岁(标准差 9),中位数体重指数为 27(四分位距 25-30)kg/m,中位数症状持续时间为 11 年(四分位距 6-15 年)。治疗后两组间无差异,但 AT 组疼痛强度[2.7(四分位距 1.5-4.9)比 5.5(四分位距 3.3-7.6);p=0.023;大效应,Cohen's d=0.8;95%置信区间(CI)0.1-1.5]和睡眠质量[12.0(四分位距 7.3-15.3)比 15.0(四分位距 13.0-17.0);p=0.030;大效应,Cohen's d=0.8;95%CI 0.1-1.5]在随访时更优。
结果表明,在 6 周随访后,AT 比 LBT 更能减轻疼痛强度和改善睡眠质量。AT 可能是纤维肌痛女性的一种良好治疗选择。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02695875。
本文贡献。