Suppr超能文献

REVEAL Lite 2 与 COMPERA 2.0 在肺动脉高压风险分层中的比较。

Comparison Between REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA 2.0 for Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Chest. 2024 Aug;166(2):373-387. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.052. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification is the cornerstone of the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Current European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines recommend using the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) three-strata risk model at baseline and the COMPERA 2.0 four-strata model at follow-up. However, the guidelines did not take into consideration other available risk scores such as the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) Lite 2.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is REVEAL Lite 2 better at discriminating risk than the COMPERA risk assessment models at baseline or follow-up evaluations?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study analyzed data from patients with PAH consecutively enrolled between June 2011 and February 2022 in the PAH registry at our expert Pulmonary Hypertension Center. Patients were stratified according to REVEAL Lite 2 and COMPERA three- and four-strata risk scores at baseline and follow-up to predict the composite outcome for lung transplantation or death. Receiver-operating characteristic curves in predicting the binary outcome at 3, 5, and 7 years were plotted. Areas under the curve of the scores were compared by using the χ test. The performance of the scores was determined according to the Harrel C statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 296 patients were included for baseline and 196 for follow-up evaluation. The overall transplant-free survival in the patient population at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years was 93.6%, 81.3%, 75.1%, and 68.8%, respectively. At baseline, the C statistic of REVEAL Lite 2 was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80), compared with 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63-0.74) for the COMPERA four-strata model and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58-0.69) for the COMPERA three-strata model. All C statistic differences between REVEAL Lite 2 and the other models were statistically significant at baseline.

INTERPRETATION

Our analysis showed that REVEAL Lite 2 was better at baseline at discriminating risk in this patient population. Future guidelines should consider including REVEAL Lite 2 in the management algorithm to help clinicians make informed decisions. Further analysis in larger cohorts could help validate these findings.

摘要

背景

风险分层是肺动脉高压(PAH)管理的基石。目前,欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会指南建议在基线时使用比较性、前瞻性肺动脉高压新药注册研究(COMPERA)三分层风险模型,在随访时使用 COMPERA 2.0 四分层模型。然而,指南并未考虑其他可用的风险评分,如评估早期和长期肺动脉高压疾病管理的登记研究(REVEAL)Lite 2.

研究问题

在基线或随访评估时,REVEAL Lite 2 比 COMPERA 风险评估模型在区分风险方面更好吗?

研究设计和方法

本研究分析了 2011 年 6 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在我们的肺动脉高压中心 PAH 登记处连续纳入的 PAH 患者的数据。患者根据 REVEAL Lite 2 和 COMPERA 三分层和四分层风险评分在基线和随访时进行分层,以预测肺移植或死亡的复合结局。绘制了预测 3、5 和 7 年时二分类结局的受试者工作特征曲线。使用 χ 检验比较评分的曲线下面积。根据 Harrell C 统计量确定评分的性能。

结果

共纳入 296 例患者进行基线评估,196 例患者进行随访评估。患者人群的总体移植无生存情况分别为 1、3、5 和 7 年时的 93.6%、81.3%、75.1%和 68.8%。在基线时,REVEAL Lite 2 的 C 统计量为 0.74(95%CI,0.69-0.80),而 COMPERA 四分层模型为 0.68(95%CI,0.63-0.74),COMPERA 三分层模型为 0.63(95%CI,0.58-0.69)。在基线时,REVEAL Lite 2 与其他模型之间的所有 C 统计量差异均具有统计学意义。

解释

我们的分析表明,在该患者人群中,REVEAL Lite 2 在基线时在区分风险方面表现更好。未来的指南应该考虑将 REVEAL Lite 2 纳入管理算法,以帮助临床医生做出明智的决策。在更大的队列中进行进一步分析可能有助于验证这些发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验