CardioVascular Center (CVC) Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
CardioVascular Center (CVC) Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Gießen, Germany.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Jul;64:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.02.014. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder embolization is an infrequent but serious complication.
We aim to describe timing, management and clinical outcomes of device embolization in a multi-center registry.
Patient characteristics, imaging findings and procedure and follow-up data were collected retrospectively. Device embolizations were categorized according to 1) timing 2) management and 3) clinical outcomes.
Sixty-seven centers contributed data. Device embolization occurred in 108 patients. In 70.4 % of cases, it happened within the first 24 h of the procedure. The device was purposefully left in the LA and the aorta in two (1.9 %) patients, an initial percutaneous retrieval was attempted in 81 (75.0 %) and surgery without prior percutaneous retrieval attempt was performed in 23 (21.3 %) patients. Two patients died before a retrieval attempt could be made. In 28/81 (34.6 %) patients with an initial percutaneous retrieval attempt a second, additional attempt was performed, which was associated with a high mortality (death in patients with one attempt: 2.9 % vs. second attempt: 21.4 %, p < 0.001). The primary outcome (bailout surgery, cardiogenic shock, stroke, TIA, and/or death) occurred in 47 (43.5 %) patients. Other major complications related to device embolization occurred in 21 (19.4 %) patients.
The majority of device embolizations after LAA closure occurs early. A percutaneous approach is often the preferred method for a first rescue attempt. Major adverse event rates, including death, are high particularly if the first retrieval attempt was unsuccessful.
This dedicated multicenter registry examined timing, management, and clinical outcome of device embolization. Early embolization (70.4 %) was most frequent. As a first rescue attempt, percutaneous retrieval was preferred in 75.0 %, followed by surgical removal (21.3 %). In patients with a second retrieval attempt a higher mortality (death first attempt: 2.9 % vs. death second attempt: 24.1 %, p < 0.001) was observed. Mortality (10.2 %) and the major complication rate after device embolization were high.
左心耳(LAA)封堵器栓塞是一种罕见但严重的并发症。
我们旨在描述多中心登记处中器械栓塞的发生时间、处理方法和临床结果。
回顾性收集患者特征、影像学发现和手术及随访数据。根据 1)时间、2)处理方法和 3)临床结果对器械栓塞进行分类。
67 个中心提供了数据。108 例患者发生器械栓塞。70.4%的病例发生在手术的前 24 小时内。2 例患者(1.9%)将器械有意留在左心房和主动脉内,81 例患者(75.0%)尝试初始经皮取回,23 例患者(21.3%)进行了未经初始经皮取回尝试的手术。两名患者在尝试取回之前死亡。在 81 例(34.6%)进行初始经皮取回尝试的患者中,有 28 例进行了第二次额外的尝试,这与较高的死亡率相关(第一次尝试死亡的患者:2.9%比第二次尝试:21.4%,p<0.001)。主要结局(紧急手术、心源性休克、中风、TIA 和/或死亡)发生在 47 例(43.5%)患者中。与器械栓塞相关的其他严重并发症发生在 21 例(19.4%)患者中。
LAA 闭合后器械栓塞的大多数发生在早期。经皮方法通常是首选的首次救援尝试方法。特别是如果第一次取回尝试不成功,主要不良事件发生率(包括死亡)很高。