• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁光 LED 疗法与磁刺激联合应用辅助治疗静脉性下肢溃疡的疗效比较——初步研究。

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation applied as the adjuvant treatment of venous leg ulcers - preliminary study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland.

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Mazovia in Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Electromagn Biol Med. 2024 Apr 2;43(1-2):95-106. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2024.2325414. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1080/15368378.2024.2325414
PMID:38449355
Abstract

PURPOSE

Venous leg ulcers are chronic wounds that are difficult to cure. The aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of two methods of physical medicine - magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation, applied as adjuvant treatment in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

METHODS

The study included 81 patients, 37 male (45.6%) and 44 female (54.3%) ones, age range between 45 and 90 years, with venous leg ulcers. The patients were assigned to two study groups: magneto-LED therapy (group 1) or magnetostimulation (group 2). In both groups, a total of 40 daily procedures were performed. Wound healing was evaluated using computerized planimetry and the pain intensity on numeric rating scale.

RESULTS

After treatment, the decrease in healing rate in group 1 was statistically significantly higher in comparison to group 2 ( < 0.001), while a statistically significant reduction in the surface area of ulcers was obtained, amounting on the average from 6.34 ± 1.29 cm to 2.31 ± 1.25 cm in group 1 ( < 0.001), and from 6.52 ± 1.20 cm to 4.79 ± 1.17 cm in group 2 ( < 0.001). The percentage changes of ulcers area in group 1 (64.21 ± 17.94%) were statistically significantly greater as compared to group 2 (25.87 ± 14.07%) ( < 0.001). After treatment, the decrease in pain relief in group 1 was statistically significantly higher in comparison to group 2 ( = 0.006), while pain intensity after treatment decreased statistically significantly in both compared groups of patients ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation caused significant reduction of surface area of the treated venous leg ulcers and pain intensity, yet magneto-LED therapy was more efficient. Both evaluated methods also significantly reduced pain intensity.

摘要

目的

静脉性腿部溃疡是一种难以治愈的慢性伤口。本研究的目的是比较两种物理医学疗法——磁-光疗法和磁刺激的疗效,将其作为辅助治疗应用于静脉性腿部溃疡的治疗中。

方法

本研究纳入了 81 名患者,男 37 名(45.6%),女 44 名(54.3%),年龄 45-90 岁,患有静脉性腿部溃疡。将患者分为两组:磁-光疗法(第 1 组)或磁刺激(第 2 组)。两组均进行 40 次每日治疗。使用计算机化的平面图评估伤口愈合情况,并使用数字评分量表评估疼痛强度。

结果

治疗后,第 1 组的愈合率下降幅度明显高于第 2 组( < 0.001),溃疡面积也明显减小,第 1 组平均从 6.34±1.29cm 减少到 2.31±1.25cm( < 0.001),第 2 组从 6.52±1.20cm 减少到 4.79±1.17cm( < 0.001)。第 1 组溃疡面积的百分比变化(64.21±17.94%)明显大于第 2 组(25.87±14.07%)( < 0.001)。治疗后,第 1 组疼痛缓解的下降幅度明显高于第 2 组( = 0.006),而两组患者的疼痛强度均明显降低( < 0.001)。

结论

磁-光疗法和磁刺激均可显著减少治疗后静脉性腿部溃疡的面积和疼痛强度,但磁-光疗法更有效。两种评估方法均显著降低了疼痛强度。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of magneto-LED therapy and magnetostimulation applied as the adjuvant treatment of venous leg ulcers - preliminary study.磁光 LED 疗法与磁刺激联合应用辅助治疗静脉性下肢溃疡的疗效比较——初步研究。
Electromagn Biol Med. 2024 Apr 2;43(1-2):95-106. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2024.2325414. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
Topical Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Versus Local Ozone Therapy in Healing of Venous Leg Ulcers.局部高压氧疗法与局部臭氧疗法治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031967.
3
Early versus deferred endovenous ablation of superficial venous reflux in patients with venous ulceration: the EVRA RCT.早期与延迟静脉内消融治疗静脉性溃疡患者浅静脉反流:EVRA RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(24):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta23240.
4
Risk factors related to the failure of venous leg ulcers to heal with compression treatment.与腿部静脉溃疡在压迫治疗下无法愈合相关的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 May;49(5):1242-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.069. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
5
Interventions for helping people adhere to compression treatments for venous leg ulceration.帮助人们坚持进行下肢静脉溃疡压迫治疗的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 6(9):CD008378. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008378.pub2.
6
Therapeutic efficacy of physical combined therapy in the treatment of venous crural ulcers.物理联合疗法治疗静脉性小腿溃疡的疗效。
Phlebology. 2021 Jul;36(6):481-488. doi: 10.1177/0268355520982452. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.联合超声和电场刺激疗法治疗下肢静脉性溃疡的疗效
Scars Burn Heal. 2023 May 24;9:20595131231174225. doi: 10.1177/20595131231174225. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Wound cleansing for treating venous leg ulcers.伤口清洗治疗静脉性腿部溃疡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 10;3(3):CD011675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011675.pub2.
9
Local Ozone Therapy in Complex Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: Ozone therapy for venous leg ulcers.局部臭氧疗法在下肢静脉溃疡综合治疗中的应用:下肢静脉溃疡的臭氧治疗
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2025 Jun;24(2):478-487. doi: 10.1177/15347346221104611. Epub 2022 May 30.
10
Use of weekly, low dose, high frequency ultrasound for hard to heal venous leg ulcers: the VenUS III randomised controlled trial.每周、低剂量、高频超声治疗难以愈合的静脉性腿部溃疡:VenUS III 随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Mar 8;342:d1092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1092.