Suppr超能文献

诊断性腹腔镜手术中的气道管理:I-Gel喉罩与Proseal喉罩的比较

Airway Management During Diagnostic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparison of I-Gel and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway.

作者信息

Sule Muhammad, Salahu Dalhat, Atiku Mamuda, Abdurrahman Ahmad, Mohammed Alhassan Datti, Abdullahi Mustapha Miko

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Muhammad Abdullahi Wase Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.

Department of Anaesthesia, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.

出版信息

J West Afr Coll Surg. 2023 Oct-Dec;13(4):34-39. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_15_23. Epub 2023 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) may be used during laparoscopic procedures in place of the often utilised endotracheal tube. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is designed with an inflatable cuff, which provides an excellent oropharyngeal seal, and the I-gel is a newer SAD designed with a softer and noninflatable cuff and sharing similar features with PLMA.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

This study compared the ease of insertion, haemodynamic and ventilatory parameters as well as morbidities associated with these SADs when used for airway management during diagnostic laparoscopic procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty American Society of Anaesthesiologist I and II patients aged 18-60 years undergoing diagnostic laparoscopic surgery under controlled ventilation had either I-gel or PLMA used for airway management. Anaesthesia was induced with standard dose of propofol, patient received atracurium, fentanyl and the SAD inserted. Pulse oximetry, capnography, noninvasive blood pressure, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), and evidence of pharyngolaryngeal morbidity were assessed. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0. The quantitative variables were analysed using the Student's test and the qualitative using the Chi-square test. A value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The success rates at first insertion for I-gel and PLMA were 95% and 80%, respectively ( = 0.04). The mean changes in mean arterial pressure following insertion were 9.6 mmHg (±4.7) and 10.6 mmHg (±8) for I-gel and PLMA, respectively ( = 0.02). The OLP during insufflation was higher in the PLMA (35.8 cmH2O) than in the I-gel group (27.9 cmH2O) ( = 0.57). In the I-gel group, 12.5% of the patients had oropharyngeal morbidities compared with 37.5% in the PLMA group ( = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Both I-gel and PLMA provide optimal ventilation during abdominal insufflation, with PLMA providing a better oropharyngeal seal, whereas I-gel has a better haemodynamic profile.

摘要

背景

在腹腔镜手术过程中,声门上气道装置(SADs)可用于替代常用的气管内导管。喉罩气道(PLMA)设计有可充气的套囊,能提供良好的口咽密封,而I-gel是一种新型的SAD,其套囊更柔软且不可充气,与PLMA具有相似的特性。

目的

本研究比较了I-gel和PLMA在诊断性腹腔镜手术气道管理中使用时的插入难易程度、血流动力学和通气参数以及相关并发症。

患者与方法

80例年龄在18至60岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I级和II级、接受控制通气下诊断性腹腔镜手术的患者,气道管理分别使用I-gel或PLMA。采用标准剂量的丙泊酚诱导麻醉,患者接受阿曲库铵、芬太尼后插入SAD。评估脉搏血氧饱和度、二氧化碳图、无创血压、口咽漏气压力(OLP)以及咽喉部并发症的情况。使用社会科学统计软件包21.0进行数据分析。定量变量采用学生t检验分析,定性变量采用卡方检验分析。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

I-gel和PLMA首次插入的成功率分别为95%和80%(P = 0.04)。插入后平均动脉压的平均变化,I-gel组为9.6 mmHg(±4.7),PLMA组为10.6 mmHg(±8)(P = 0.02)。充气期间PLMA的OLP(35.8 cmH₂O)高于I-gel组(27.9 cmH₂O)(P = 0.57)。I-gel组12.5%的患者出现口咽并发症,而PLMA组为37.5%(P = 0.009)。

结论

I-gel和PLMA在腹部充气期间均能提供最佳通气,PLMA提供更好的口咽密封,而I-gel具有更好的血流动力学表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ff/10914103/b1fd126f3f2b/JWACS-13-34-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验