Ahmed Suhail, Prakash Aaditya, Kumar Upadhyay Amitabh
Radiation Oncology, Meherbai Tata Memorial Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Radiation Oncology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 5;16(2):e53622. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53622. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Background This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different radiation therapy regimens in treating patients with symptomatic bone metastases. Methodology A retrospective study was conducted by assigning patients with symptomatic bone metastases from different primary cancers into three groups, namely, Arms A, B, and C. The radiation dose delivered in each arm was as follows: 8 Gray (Gy) in a single fraction for Arm A, 20 Gy in five fractions at the rate of 4 Gy per fraction for Arm B, and 30 Gy in 10 fractions at the rate of 3 Gy per fraction for Arm C. Each arm consisted of 15 patients. A comparison was conducted across all three arms to evaluate pain relief based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), performance score improvement based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and analgesic requirement based on the World Health Organization (WHO) step ladder at one week, one month, and three months. Results The pain relief was measured using the VAS in three different arms, i.e., Arm A, B, and C. After one week, the pain relief was 66.67%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. After one month, it was 73.33% in all three arms. At three months, it was 80%, 86.67%, and 86.67%, respectively. The study also measured the improvement in the ECOG performance score. The improvement in all three arms was 60% after one week and 66.67% in Arm A and 73.33% in Arms B and C after one month. After three months, the improvement was 73.33%, 80%, and 80% in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. The decrease in analgesic usage was also measured in all three arms. After one week, it was 60% in all three arms. After one month, it was 66.67%, 73.33%, and 73.33% in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. At three months, it was 73.33%, 80%, and 80% in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. No significant statistical difference was found between the three arms. Conclusions The efficacy of a single 8 Gy arm was almost equivalent to that of other arms of multifractionated regimens in terms of improvement in pain and performance score and decreased use of analgesics for a short duration of follow-up. For high-volume cancer centers and patients with economic constraints, a single-fraction regime provides effective palliation for painful bone metastases.
背景 本研究旨在评估不同放射治疗方案对有症状骨转移患者的疗效。
方法 进行了一项回顾性研究,将来自不同原发癌的有症状骨转移患者分为三组,即A组、B组和C组。每组的放射剂量如下:A组单次分割给予8格雷(Gy),B组以每次4 Gy的剂量分五次给予20 Gy,C组以每次3 Gy的剂量分十次给予30 Gy。每组由15名患者组成。在一周、一个月和三个月时,对所有三组进行比较,以根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛缓解情况,根据东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评估功能状态评分改善情况,并根据世界卫生组织(WHO)阶梯法评估镇痛药物需求。
结果 在A组、B组和C组这三个不同组中使用VAS测量疼痛缓解情况。一周后,疼痛缓解率分别为66.67%、60%和60%。一个月后,三组的疼痛缓解率均为73.33%。三个月时,分别为80%、86.67%和86.67%。该研究还测量了ECOG功能状态评分的改善情况。一周后,三组的改善率均为60%;一个月后,A组为66.67%,B组和C组为73.33%。三个月后,A组、B组和C组的改善率分别为73.33%、80%和80%。还测量了所有三组中镇痛药物使用的减少情况。一周后,三组均为60%。一个月后,A组为66.67%,B组和C组分别为73.33%和73.33%。三个月时,A组、B组和C组分别为73.33%、80%和80%。三组之间未发现显著的统计学差异。
结论 在短期随访中,就疼痛和功能状态评分的改善以及镇痛药物使用的减少而言,单次8 Gy组的疗效与其他多分割方案组几乎相当。对于大型癌症中心和经济受限的患者,单次分割方案可为疼痛性骨转移提供有效的姑息治疗。