Watanabe Taeko, Tamiya Nanako
Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Health Services Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Glob Health Med. 2024 Feb 29;6(1):63-69. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2023.01135.
Despite high expectations from the government and researchers regarding data utilization, comprehensive analysis of long-term care (LTC)-related data use has been limited. This study reviewed the use of LTC-related data, including Kaigo-DB, in Japan after 2020. There was an increase in studies using LTC-related data in Japan between 2020 and 2021, followed by a stabilization period. The national government provided 13.5% of this data (6.5% from Kaigo-DB), while prefectures and municipalities contributed 85.2%, and facilities provided 1.3%. The linked data used in 90.4% of the studies primarily consisted of original questionnaire or interview surveys (34.6%) and medical claims (34.0%). None of the studies based on Kaigo-DB utilized linked data. In terms of study design, cohort studies were the most common (84.6%), followed by descriptive (5.1%), cross-sectional (3.2%), and case-control studies (1.3%). Among the 138 individual-based analytical descriptive studies, the most frequently used LTC-related data as an exposure was LTC services (26.8%), and the most common data used as an outcome was LTC certification or care need level (43.5%), followed by the independence degree of daily living for the older adults with dementia (18.1%). To enhance the use of LTC-related data, especially the valuable national Kaigo-DB, insights can be gleaned from how researchers effectively utilize municipal and prefectural data. Streamlining access to Kaigo-DB and enabling its linkage with other datasets are promising for future research in this field.
尽管政府和研究人员对数据利用寄予厚望,但对长期护理(LTC)相关数据使用的全面分析仍然有限。本研究回顾了2020年后日本LTC相关数据的使用情况,包括老年护理数据库(Kaigo-DB)。2020年至2021年期间,日本使用LTC相关数据的研究有所增加,随后进入稳定期。国家政府提供了13.5%的数据(其中6.5%来自老年护理数据库),而县和市贡献了85.2%,机构提供了1.3%。90.4%的研究中使用的关联数据主要包括原始问卷调查或访谈调查(34.6%)和医疗理赔数据(34.0%)。没有一项基于老年护理数据库的研究使用关联数据。在研究设计方面,队列研究最为常见(84.6%),其次是描述性研究(5.1%)、横断面研究(3.2%)和病例对照研究(1.3%)。在138项基于个体的分析性描述性研究中,作为暴露因素最常使用的LTC相关数据是LTC服务(26.8%),作为结果最常使用的数据是LTC认证或护理需求水平(43.5%),其次是老年痴呆症患者的日常生活独立程度(18.1%)。为了加强LTC相关数据的使用,特别是宝贵的国家老年护理数据库,从研究人员如何有效利用市县级数据中可以获得一些见解。简化对老年护理数据库的访问并使其与其他数据集建立联系,对该领域未来的研究很有前景。