Tossini Natália Barbosa, Melo Cristiane de Sousa, Braz de Oliveira Marcos Paulo, Moreira Roberta de Fátima Carreira, Serrão Paula Regina Mendes da Silva
Departament of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Dec;46(26):6251-6265. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2325652. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of physiotherapeutic interventions in individuals with thumb primary CMC OA on the outcomes of pain, hand function, grip or pinch strength.
RCTs that used some type of physiotherapeutic intervention compared to a passive or active control group were included. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach and, for the calculation of the meta-analysis, the standardized difference of means (SMD) was used.
Nineteen studies ( = 1477) were included and eight studies ( = 568) underwent meta-analysis. Orthosis intervention was superior to passive control group for pain improvement (SMD = -1.02, = 0.03, very low evidence), grip strength (SMD = 0.45, = 0.02, very low evidence) and pinch strength (SMD = 1.78, = 0.01, very low evidence), but there was no improvement in hand function ( = 0.54). The use of a neoprene orthosis was similar to the use of a thermoplastic orthosis in improving pain ( = 0.38), hand function ( = 0.50), grip strength ( = 0.42) and pinch strength ( = 0.14). The use of short thermoplastic orthosis was also similar to long thermoplastic orthosis in improving pain ( = 0.88) and hand function ( = 0.58).
The use of orthoses is superior to no intervention in all outcomes, exception hand function.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究物理治疗干预对拇指原发性第一腕掌关节骨关节炎患者疼痛、手部功能、握力或捏力结果的影响。
纳入使用某种物理治疗干预并与被动或主动对照组进行比较的随机对照试验。采用GRADE方法评估证据质量,荟萃分析计算时使用均值标准化差异(SMD)。
纳入19项研究(n = 1477),8项研究(n = 568)进行荟萃分析。矫形器干预在改善疼痛(SMD = -1.02,P = 0.03,证据质量极低)、握力(SMD = 0.45,P = 0.02,证据质量极低)和捏力(SMD = 1.78,P = 0.01,证据质量极低)方面优于被动对照组,但手部功能无改善(P = 0.54)。在改善疼痛(P = 0.38)、手部功能(P = 0.50)、握力(P = 0.42)和捏力(P = 0.14)方面,氯丁橡胶矫形器的使用与热塑性矫形器相似。短热塑性矫形器在改善疼痛(P = 0.88)和手部功能(P = 0.58)方面也与长热塑性矫形器相似。
除手部功能外,在所有结果方面,使用矫形器均优于不进行干预。