Crume Bonnie, Suufi Mohamed, Nabbosa Gloria, Parker-Hartigan Lori, McBride Ashley, Rufo Paul A, Crowley McGreggor
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 May;78(5):1069-1081. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12176. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
Previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between socioeconomic disparities and missed clinic visits (MCV). However, the relationship between patient-preferred language and MCVs, particularly with respect to telemedicine, remains relatively underexplored. We sought to characterize the associations between MCV and patient-level predictors, including preferred language, in a large single-center pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition practice.
This retrospective longitudinal cohort study included all missed or completed outpatient visits in the Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Programs at Boston Children's Hospital from January 1, 2016 to May 20, 2022. Univariate and multivariate hierarchical generalized linear mixed models were employed to identify associations between visit- and patient-level predictors and an MCV outcome.
A total of 300,201 visits from 70,710 patients residing in Massachusetts were included. Univariate analyses revealed higher MCV odds for Hispanic patients and those from areas with the highest Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and these odds increased with telemedicine (Hispanic in-person odds ratio [OR] 5.21 [(95% confidence interval) 4.93-5.52] vs. telemedicine OR 8.79 [7.85-9.83]; highest SVI in-person OR 5.28 [4.95-5.64] vs. telemedicine OR 7.82 [6.84-8.96]). Controlled multivariate analyses revealed that among six language groups, only Spanish language preference was associated with higher MCV odds, which increased with telemedicine (Spanish in-person adjusted OR [aOR] 1.35 [1.24-1.48] vs. telemedicine aOR 2.1 [1.83-2.44]).
Patients preferring Spanish experience unique barriers to care beyond those faced by other language preference groups, and telemedicine may exacerbate these barriers.
以往研究已证明社会经济差异与门诊漏诊(MCV)之间存在关联。然而,患者首选语言与门诊漏诊之间的关系,尤其是在远程医疗方面,仍相对未得到充分研究。我们试图在一个大型单中心儿科胃肠病学、肝病学和营养科实践中,描述门诊漏诊与患者层面预测因素(包括首选语言)之间的关联。
这项回顾性纵向队列研究纳入了2016年1月1日至2022年5月20日期间波士顿儿童医院胃肠病学、肝病学和营养项目中所有漏诊或完成的门诊就诊。采用单变量和多变量分层广义线性混合模型来确定就诊层面和患者层面预测因素与门诊漏诊结果之间的关联。
共纳入了居住在马萨诸塞州的70710名患者的300201次就诊。单变量分析显示,西班牙裔患者以及来自社会脆弱性指数(SVI)最高地区的患者门诊漏诊几率更高,并且这些几率在远程医疗中有所增加(西班牙裔面对面就诊优势比[OR]为5.21[(95%置信区间)4.93 - 5.52],而远程医疗OR为8.79[7.85 - 9.83];SVI最高地区面对面就诊OR为5.28[4.95 - 5.64],而远程医疗OR为7.82[6.84 - 8.96])。多变量控制分析显示,在六个语言组中,只有西班牙语偏好与更高的门诊漏诊几率相关,并且在远程医疗中几率增加(西班牙语面对面调整后优势比[aOR]为1.35[1.24 - 1.48],而远程医疗aOR为2.1[1.83 - 2.44])。
与其他语言偏好组相比,偏好西班牙语的患者在获得医疗服务方面面临独特障碍,并且远程医疗可能会加剧这些障碍。