• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺贝尔奖悖论:诺贝尔奖,名不副实的奖项。

Nobel Prize paradox: Nobel Prize, not a noble prize.

机构信息

The Arabic Preprint Server (ArabiXiv), Paris, France.

出版信息

Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2024 Apr;224(4):233-236. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.rceng.2024.03.001
PMID:38452899
Abstract

The Nobel Prize is one of the most sought-after awards in science and society. However, its reputation is not without complexities, including constraints on laureates and biases in nominations. Navigating the delicate balance between recognition and the tangible impacts of awarded contributions should offer insight into the Prize's significance beyond mere prestige and monetary value. While other awards may boast higher financial rewards, they often lack the same level of prestige. The inclusion of public figures as laureates and the extensive media coverage surrounding the Nobel Prize may further elevate its perceived importance, though this may hide a more nuanced reality. Additionally, the positive associations linked to the name "Nobel" resembling the adjective "noble" can enhance the award's prestige. This subtle connection to "nobility" adds a layer of honor and distinction to the Prize, contributing to its perceived significance and prestige. Moreover, the overrepresentation of Nobel laureates from specific countries prompts scrutiny over the fulfillment of Nobel's testament, which prioritizes contributions to global well-being. This discrepancy raises questions about the inclusivity and global impact of the Prize.

摘要

诺贝尔奖是科学界和社会最梦寐以求的奖项之一。然而,它的声誉并非没有复杂性,包括对获奖者的限制和提名中的偏见。在认可和授予贡献的实际影响之间取得微妙的平衡,应该可以深入了解该奖项的意义,超越纯粹的声望和货币价值。虽然其他奖项可能有更高的财务奖励,但它们往往缺乏同样的声望。将公众人物作为获奖者纳入其中,以及围绕诺贝尔奖的广泛媒体报道,可能会进一步提高其被认为的重要性,尽管这可能掩盖了更为复杂的现实。此外,与形容词“高尚的”相似的“诺贝尔”这个名字所带来的积极联想,可以增强该奖项的声望。这种与“高贵”的微妙联系,为该奖项增添了一层荣誉和区别,使其被认为具有重要意义和声望。此外,特定国家的诺贝尔奖获得者的过度代表引发了对诺贝尔遗嘱的履行情况的审查,该遗嘱优先考虑对全球福祉的贡献。这种差异引发了对该奖项的包容性和全球影响力的质疑。

相似文献

1
Nobel Prize paradox: Nobel Prize, not a noble prize.诺贝尔奖悖论:诺贝尔奖,名不副实的奖项。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2024 Apr;224(4):233-236. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
2
The Colombian scientific elite-Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator.哥伦比亚科学界精英——科学图谱绘制与使用综合引文指标与诺贝尔奖得主的比较
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0269116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269116. eCollection 2022.
3
Nobel prizes: contributions to cardiology.诺贝尔奖:对心脏病学的贡献。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015 Aug;105(2):188-96. doi: 10.5935/abc.20150041. Epub 2015 May 5.
4
Bibliometric analysis of Nobelists' awards and landmark papers in physiology or medicine during 1983-2012.1983-2012 年诺贝尔生理学或医学奖得主及其里程碑式论文的文献计量学分析。
Ann Med. 2013 Dec;45(8):532-8. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2013.850838. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
[Laveran and the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine].[拉韦朗与诺贝尔生理学或医学奖]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Feb 8;3(1). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i1.2023.310. eCollection 2023 Mar 31.
6
Disparities in funding for Nobel Prize awards in medicine and physiology across nationalities, races, and gender.诺贝尔医学奖和生理学奖在资金资助方面存在国籍、种族和性别差异。
J Cell Physiol. 2024 Jul;239(7):e31157. doi: 10.1002/jcp.31157. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
7
Why there should be more science Nobel prizes and laureates - And why proportionate credit should be awarded to institutions.为何应该设立更多诺贝尔科学奖奖项以及获奖者——以及为何应给予各机构相应的荣誉。
Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(3):471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
8
Bibliometric comparison of Nobel Prize laureates in physiology or medicine and chemistry.诺贝尔生理学或医学奖得主与化学奖得主的文献计量学比较。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Sep;397(9):7169-7185. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03081-z. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
9
"Nobel Prizes in Medicine as an overview on XX and XXI centuries biomedicine and health sciences: historical and epistemological considerations".“XX 和 XXI 世纪生物医学和健康科学的诺贝尔奖概述:历史和认识论的思考”。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jun 5;91(4):e2020091. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4.9585.
10
The "Nobel Population" in Pharmacology: Nobel Prize laureates, nominees and nominators 1901-1953 with a focus on B. Naunyn and O. Schmiedeberg.药理学领域的“诺贝尔群体”:1901年至1953年的诺贝尔奖获得者、被提名者及提名者,重点关注B. 瑙尼恩和O. 施米德贝格。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;393(7):1173-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00210-019-01807-y. Epub 2020 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
University rankings: Time to reconsider.大学排名:是时候重新考虑了。
Bioimpacts. 2024 Apr 6;15:30290. doi: 10.34172/bi.2024.30290. eCollection 2025.