Jin Lu, Quan Jing, Pan Xiang, He Tao, Hu Jia, Li Yifan, Gui Yaoting, Yang Shangqi, Mao Xiangming, Chen Yun, Lai Yongqing
Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036, P.R. China.
Department of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, P.R. China.
Mol Med Rep. 2024 May;29(5). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13194. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, concerrning the Transwell cell migration and invasion assay data shown in Fig. 6A and B for the 786‑O cell line on p. 7206, the pcDNA3.1‑EGOT 'Migration' and 'Invasion' (a‑1 and b‑1) data panels appeared to contain overlapping sections of data, such that they were potentially derived from the same original source, where these panels were intended to show the results from differently performed experiments. The authors have re‑examined their original data, and realize that the 'Invasion' (b‑1) panel in Fig. 6B was inadvertently chosen incorrectly. The revised version of Fig. 6, now featuring the correct data for the 'Invasion' experiment (B1 in the replacement figure) in Fig. 6B, is shown on the next page. Note that this error did not adversely affect either the results or the overall conclusions reported in this study. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of for allowing them the opportunity to publish this. They also wish to apologize to the readership of the Journal for any inconvenience caused.[Molecular Medicine Reports 16: 7072‑7079, 2017; DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7470].
在上述论文发表之后,一位感兴趣的读者提请作者注意,关于第7206页图6A和B中所示的786-O细胞系的Transwell细胞迁移和侵袭试验数据,pcDNA3.1-EGOT的“迁移”和“侵袭”(a-1和b-1)数据面板似乎包含重叠的数据部分,以至于它们可能源自相同的原始来源,而这些面板旨在展示不同实验的结果。作者重新检查了他们的原始数据,意识到图6B中的“侵袭”(b-1)面板被错误地选择了。图6的修订版在下一页展示,现在图6B中有“侵袭”实验的正确数据(替换图中的B1)。请注意,此错误对本研究报告的结果或总体结论均未产生不利影响。所有作者均同意发表此勘误,并感谢《》杂志编辑给予他们发表此勘误的机会。他们也希望就所造成的任何不便向该期刊的读者致歉。[《分子医学报告》16: 7072-7079, 2017; DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7470]