Suppr超能文献

东亚患者接受免疫治疗相关治疗与晚期非小细胞肺癌的生存获益改善相关:一项更新的荟萃分析。

East Asian patients who received immunotherapy-based therapy associated with improved survival benefit in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: An updated meta-analysis.

机构信息

Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Feb;13(4):e7080. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7080.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have been recommended as the standard treatment for advanced NSCLC patients without driver-gene mutations. However, there are different genetic characteristics and biological traits of tumors between non-East Asian (nEA) and East Asian (EA) patients with NSCLC, which may contribute to differences in the efficacy of ICIs in different ethnic populations. Previous findings regarding differences in the efficacy of ICIs among ethnic groups have been inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis by collecting published data to investigate the clinical outcomes of ICIs for EA NSCLC patients compared to nEA patients.

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used to access the difference in survival outcomes between the two populations. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the line of ICIs, the use of ICIs alone or in combination, and the type of ICIs.

RESULTS

A total of 9826 NSCLC patients from 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 4064 EAs were included, which involved PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors. EA NSCLC patients who received ICIs-based therapy were associated with significantly improved survival benefits in OS (p = 0.02) compared with nEA patients. Subgroup analysis indicated that EA patients receiving first-line ICIs showed significantly superior OS compared with nEA patients (p = 0.007). Chemo-ICIs treatment showed significant advantages in terms of OS (p = 0.002) and PFS (p = 0.02) among EA patients compared to nEA patients. In addition, PD-1 inhibitors were associated with improved OS among both EA patients and nEA patients compared with PD-L1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

EA NSCLC patients who received ICIs-based therapy were associated with significantly improved survival benefits compared with nEA NSCLC patients. Earlier intervention with ICIs and combination treatment was more recommended for EA NSCLC patients. Moreover, PD-1 inhibitors are associated with prolonged survival among both EA and nEA patients.

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合化疗已被推荐为无驱动基因突变的晚期 NSCLC 患者的标准治疗方法。然而,非东亚(nEA)和东亚(EA) NSCLC 患者之间的肿瘤具有不同的遗传特征和生物学特征,这可能导致不同种族人群中 ICI 的疗效存在差异。先前关于不同种族人群中 ICI 疗效差异的研究结果并不一致。因此,我们通过收集已发表的数据进行荟萃分析,以研究 EA NSCLC 患者与 nEA 患者接受 ICI 治疗的临床结局。

方法

使用总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)来评估两种人群之间生存结局的差异。根据 ICI 治疗线数、单独使用或联合使用 ICI 以及 ICI 类型进行亚组分析。

结果

共有 21 项随机对照试验(RCTs)的 9826 例 NSCLC 患者纳入本研究,其中包括 PD-1、PD-L1 和 CTLA-4 抑制剂。接受 ICI 治疗的 EA NSCLC 患者的 OS 获益显著优于 nEA 患者(p=0.02)。亚组分析表明,接受一线 ICI 治疗的 EA 患者的 OS 显著优于 nEA 患者(p=0.007)。与 nEA 患者相比,EA 患者接受化疗联合 ICI 治疗在 OS(p=0.002)和 PFS(p=0.02)方面具有显著优势。此外,与 PD-L1 抑制剂相比,PD-1 抑制剂在 EA 患者和 nEA 患者中均与 OS 改善相关。

结论

与 nEA NSCLC 患者相比,接受 ICI 治疗的 EA NSCLC 患者的生存获益显著改善。对于 EA NSCLC 患者,更推荐尽早采用 ICI 治疗和联合治疗。此外,PD-1 抑制剂在 EA 和 nEA 患者中均与延长生存相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad50/10923033/8f8abbc2f61c/CAM4-13-e7080-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验