Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Data Science, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 1;65(3). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae089.
To compare oncologic outcomes after segmentectomy with division of segmental bronchus, artery and vein (complete anatomic segmentectomy) versus segmentectomy with division of <3 segmental structures (incomplete anatomic segmentectomy).
We conducted a single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing segmentectomy from March 2005 to May 2020. Operative reports were audited to classify procedures as complete or incomplete anatomic segmentectomy. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy or pulmonary resection beyond indicated segments were excluded. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier models and compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for death. Cumulative incidence functions for loco-regional recurrence were compared with Gray's test, with death considered a competing event. Cox and Fine-Gray models were used to estimate cause-specific and subdistribution HRs, respectively, for loco-regional recurrence.
Of 390 cases, 266 (68.2%) were complete and 124 were incomplete anatomic segmentectomy. Demographics, pulmonary function, tumour size, stage and perioperative outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Surgical margins were negative in all but 1 case. Complete anatomic segmentectomy was associated with improved lymph node dissection (5 vs 2 median nodes sampled; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed reduced incidence of loco-regional recurrence (cause-specific HR = 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.80; subdistribution HR = 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.81), and non-significant improvement in overall survival (HR = 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-1.00) after complete versus incomplete anatomic segmentectomy.
This single-centre experience suggests complete anatomic segmentectomy provides superior loco-regional control and may improve survival relative to incomplete anatomic segmentectomy. We recommend surgeons perform complete anatomic segmentectomy and lymph node dissection whenever possible.
比较节段切除术联合支气管、动脉和静脉分割(完全解剖性节段切除术)与节段切除术联合<3 个节段结构分割(不完全解剖性节段切除术)的肿瘤学结果。
我们对 2005 年 3 月至 2020 年 5 月期间接受节段切除术的患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。审核手术报告以将手术分类为完全或不完全解剖性节段切除术。排除接受新辅助治疗或超出指征节段的肺切除术的患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 模型估计生存率,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计死亡的风险比(HR)。使用 Gray 检验比较局部区域复发的累积发生率,并将死亡视为竞争事件。使用 Cox 和 Fine-Gray 模型分别估计局部区域复发的原因特异性和亚分布 HR。
在 390 例患者中,266 例(68.2%)为完全解剖性节段切除术,124 例为不完全解剖性节段切除术。两组患者的人口统计学、肺功能、肿瘤大小、分期和围手术期结局无显著差异。除 1 例外,所有手术切缘均为阴性。完全解剖性节段切除术与淋巴结清扫的增加有关(5 个 vs 中位数 2 个采样淋巴结;P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,局部区域复发的发生率降低(原因特异性 HR=0.42;95%置信区间 0.22-0.80;亚分布 HR=0.43;95%置信区间 0.23-0.81),完全解剖性节段切除术与不完全解剖性节段切除术相比,总生存率无显著改善(HR=0.66;95%置信区间:0.43-1.00)。
这项单中心经验表明,与不完全解剖性节段切除术相比,完全解剖性节段切除术提供了更好的局部区域控制,并且可能改善生存。我们建议外科医生在可能的情况下进行完全解剖性节段切除术和淋巴结清扫。