Elshazly Tarek M, Bourauel Christoph, Aldesoki Mostafa, Salvatori Damiano, Alhotan Abdulaziz, Keilig Ludger, Ghoneima Ahmed
Oral Technology, Dental School, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine (HBMCDM), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Dec;27 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):131-140. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12779. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
To use the finite element method (FEM) to investigate the effect of various attachment configurations and trimming line designs of orthodontic aligners on their biomechanical performance.
A 3D upper jaw model was imported into 3D design software. The upper right central incisor tooth (Tooth 11) was made mobile, and its periodontal ligament (PDL) and bone structures were designed. Aligners were modelled with three distinct attachment configurations: No attachment, rectangular horizontal, rectangular vertical, and two trimming line designs; scalloped and straight extended, with a homogeneous thickness of 0.6 mm. These models were then imported into an FE software. Simulations were conducted for three different movements, including facial translation, distalization, and extrusion.
Forces were recorded at 1.3-2.6 N during facial translation, 1.4-5.9 N in distalization, and 0.0-2.0 N in extrusion. The straight extended trimming line consistently generated higher forces than the scalloped design. Attachments had no significant impact on force components during facial translation but were more effective in distalization and extrusion. The combination of a straight extended trimming line with horizontal attachments exhibited the least stresses at the apical third during distalization, and the highest stresses during extrusion, suggesting superior retention.
Rectangular attachments offer limited benefits in facial translation, but horizontal rectangular attachments can intensify load in distalization and are crucial for force generation in extrusion. Horizontal attachments are preferred over vertical options. Additionally, the straight extended trim line enhances control of tooth movement and can replace attachments in certain cases.
These findings provide biomechanical evidence and an optimal protocol to guide clinical practice in planning diverse teeth movements. The emphasis is on the influence of attachment utilization and the specific design of aligner trimming lines to enhance control over tooth movement.
运用有限元法(FEM)研究正畸矫治器的各种附件配置和修整线设计对其生物力学性能的影响。
将三维上颌模型导入三维设计软件。使右上中切牙(11号牙)可移动,并设计其牙周膜(PDL)和骨结构。用三种不同的附件配置对矫治器进行建模:无附件、矩形水平、矩形垂直,以及两种修整线设计;扇形和直线延伸型,厚度均匀为0.6毫米。然后将这些模型导入有限元软件。针对三种不同的移动进行模拟,包括唇向平移、远中移动和伸长移动。
唇向平移时记录到的力为1.3 - 2.6牛,远中移动时为1.4 - 5.9牛,伸长移动时为0.0 - 2.0牛。直线延伸型修整线始终比扇形设计产生更高的力。附件在唇向平移时对力的分量没有显著影响,但在远中移动和伸长移动时更有效。直线延伸型修整线与水平附件的组合在远中移动时根尖三分之一处应力最小,在伸长移动时应力最大,表明固位效果更佳。
矩形附件在唇向平移中益处有限,但水平矩形附件可增强远中移动时的负荷,对伸长移动时的力产生至关重要。水平附件优于垂直附件。此外,直线延伸型修整线可增强对牙齿移动的控制,在某些情况下可替代附件。
这些发现为指导不同牙齿移动规划的临床实践提供了生物力学证据和最佳方案。重点在于附件使用的影响以及矫治器修整线的具体设计对增强牙齿移动控制的作用。