• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激光切除尿道网片侵蚀:10 年经验。

Laser excision of urethral mesh erosion: a 10-year experience.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA.

Urologic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 4000 Cambridge Street, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Mar 9;42(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04822-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-04822-8
PMID:38460045
Abstract

PURPOSE

To review our 10-year experience with laser excision for urethral mesh erosion (UME) of mid-urethral slings (MUS).

METHODS

Following Institutional Review Board approval, the charts of female patients with endoscopic laser excision of UME were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, clinical presentation, surgical history, pre- and post-operative Urinary Distress Inventory-6 scores and quality of life ratings, operative reports, and outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. UME cure was defined as no residual mesh on office cystourethroscopy 5-6 months after the final laser excision procedure.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2021, 23 patients met study criteria; median age was 56 (range 44-79) years. Twenty (87%) had multiple prior urogynecologic procedures. Median time from MUS placement to presentation with UME-related complaints was 5.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.3-7.6] years. The most common presenting symptom was recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) (n = 10). Median operating time was 49 (IQR 37-80) minutes. Median duration of follow-up was 24 (IQR 12-84) months. Fourteen (61%) required more than 1 laser excision procedure for UME. Although 5 were asymptomatic (22%), new (n = 5) or persistent (n = 8) urinary incontinence was the most common symptom on follow-up (57%).

CONCLUSION

UME presenting symptoms are highly variable, necessitating a high index of suspicion in patients with a history of MUS, especially in the case of rUTI. Endoscopic laser excision is a minimally invasive, brief, safe, outpatient procedure with a high UME cure rate.

摘要

目的

回顾我们在使用激光切除尿道中段吊带(MUS)所致尿道网片侵蚀(UME)方面的 10 年经验。

方法

在获得机构审查委员会批准后,对接受内镜激光切除 UME 的女性患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。从电子病历中获取了人口统计学资料、临床表现、手术史、术前和术后尿困扰量表 6 分(Urinary Distress Inventory-6 score)和生活质量评分、手术报告和结果。在最后一次激光切除 5-6 个月后,在局麻膀胱尿道镜下未见残余网片定义为 UME 治愈。

结果

2011 年至 2021 年,共有 23 名患者符合研究标准;中位年龄为 56 岁(范围 44-79 岁)。20 例(87%)有多种既往妇科泌尿手术史。从 MUS 放置到出现与 UME 相关症状的中位时间为 5.3 年(四分位距 [IQR] 2.3-7.6)。最常见的首发症状是复发性尿路感染(rUTI)(n=10)。中位手术时间为 49 分钟(IQR 37-80)。中位随访时间为 24 个月(IQR 12-84)。14 例(61%)需要多次激光切除才能治愈 UME。尽管有 5 例无症状(22%),但在随访时最常见的症状是新发(n=5)或持续存在的(n=8)尿失禁(57%)。

结论

UME 的首发症状多种多样,因此对于有 MUS 病史的患者,特别是在 rUTI 的情况下,需要高度怀疑 UME 的可能性。内镜激光切除是一种微创、短暂、安全的门诊手术,UME 治愈率高。

相似文献

1
Laser excision of urethral mesh erosion: a 10-year experience.激光切除尿道网片侵蚀:10 年经验。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 9;42(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04822-8.
2
Holmium laser excision for urinary mesh erosion: a minimally invasive treatment with favorable long-term results.钬激光切除治疗泌尿网片侵蚀:一种具有良好长期效果的微创治疗方法。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1645-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2752-3. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Holmium:YAG Laser Ablation for the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Foreign Bodies Following Incontinence Surgery: A Case Series and Systematic Review.钬激光消融术治疗尿失禁手术后下尿路异物:病例系列及系统评价
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1252-1261. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0557. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
4
Clinical Application of a Transurethral Holmium Laser Excision of Exposed Polypropylene Mesh at Lower Urinary Tract: Single Surgeon Experience With Long-term Follow-up.经尿道钬激光切除下尿路暴露聚丙烯网片的临床应用:单中心长期随访经验
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan/Feb;24(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000417.
5
Should endoscopic laser excision be offered as the first-line management for patients with eroded mesh? Outcomes of a systematic review of literature.内镜激光切除是否应作为侵蚀性网片患者的一线治疗?文献系统评价的结果。
Curr Opin Urol. 2024 Mar 1;34(2):135-144. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001146. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
6
Endoscopic management of intraurethral mesh extrusion with the holmium:YAG laser is an acceptable treatment option in selected patients.钬激光内镜处理尿道内网状物突出是一种可接受的治疗选择,适用于选定的患者。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Aug;41(6):1511-1516. doi: 10.1002/nau.24999. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
7
Complications Following the Insertion of Two Synthetic Mid-urethral Slings and Subsequent Removal.两根合成材料的中段尿道吊带置入及后续取出后的并发症
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018 Sep;10(3):259-265. doi: 10.1111/luts.12175. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
8
Comparison of retropubic synthetic mid-urethral slings to fascia pubovaginal slings following failed sling surgery.耻骨后合成材料中尿道吊带与耻骨阴道筋膜吊带在吊带手术失败后的比较。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Sep;35(7):851-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.22819. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
9
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
10
Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling.人工合成尿道中段悬吊带失败后自体耻骨后阴道悬吊带的成功应用
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):916-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
A Deception Study to Avoid Recall Bias Confirms Similar Scores for 3 Validated Questionnaires in the Office or Over the Phone in Women With or Without Urinary Incontinence.一项避免回忆偏倚的欺骗研究证实,在有或无尿失禁的女性中,在办公室或通过电话使用 3 种经过验证的问卷得到的相似分数。
J Urol. 2022 Dec;208(6):1288-1294. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002891. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Endoscopic management of intraurethral mesh extrusion with the holmium:YAG laser is an acceptable treatment option in selected patients.钬激光内镜处理尿道内网状物突出是一种可接受的治疗选择,适用于选定的患者。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Aug;41(6):1511-1516. doi: 10.1002/nau.24999. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
A misdiagnosis of mesh extrusion treated as a psychiatric female pelvic pain.
将网片挤出误诊为精神性女性盆腔疼痛。
Urologia. 2022 Feb;89(1):131-135. doi: 10.1177/0391560320974890. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Role of endoscopic management in synthetic sling/mesh erosion following previous incontinence surgery: a systematic review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists (YAU) and Uro-technology (ESUT) groups.内镜治疗在既往尿失禁手术后合成吊带/网片侵蚀中的作用:欧洲泌尿外科协会青年学术泌尿外科医生(YAU)和泌尿外科技术(ESUT)小组的系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jan;31(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04087-5. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
The Management and Efficacy of Surgical Techniques Used for Erosive Mesh in the Urethra and Bladder: A Systematic Review.尿道和膀胱腐蚀性网片手术技术的管理和疗效:系统评价。
Urology. 2019 Dec;134:2-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
6
Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: AUA/CUA/SUFU Guideline.女性复发性单纯性尿路感染:AUA/CUA/SUFU 指南。
J Urol. 2019 Aug;202(2):282-289. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000296. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.合成吊带手术的安全性考虑。
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Sep;12(9):481-509. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.183. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
8
Evaluation of endoscopic laser excision of polypropylene mesh/sutures following anti-incontinence procedures.评估抗失禁手术后内镜下激光切除聚丙烯网/缝线。
J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1828-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.040. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
9
Critical review of lasers in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).激光治疗良性前列腺增生症的评价。
BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107(7):1030-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09954.x.
10
Evaluation of holmium laser for managing mesh/suture complications of continence surgery.评估钬激光在处理控尿手术中缝线/网片并发症的应用。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(9):1472-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10012.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.