• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和医生对乳腺癌护理患者安全轨迹的看法和经验。

Patients' and doctors' views and experiences of the patient safety trajectory of breast cancer care.

机构信息

Academic Track Intern Programme, Intern Network Executive, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Department of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland; Cancer Research@UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Breast. 2024 Jun;75:103699. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103699. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2024.103699
PMID:38460442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10943021/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Successful breast cancer outcomes can be jeopardised by adverse events. Understanding and integrating patients' and doctors' perspectives into care trajectories could improve patient safety. This study assessed their views on, and experiences of, medical error and patient safety.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, quantitative 20-40 item questionnaire for patients attending Cork University Hospital Cancer Centre and breast cancer doctors in the Republic of Ireland was developed. Domains included demographics, medical error experience, patient safety opinions and concerns.

RESULTS

184 patients and 116 doctors completed the survey. Of the doctors, 41.4% felt patient safety had deteriorated over the previous five years and 54.3% felt patient safety measures were inadequate compared to 13.0% and 27.7% of patients respectively. Of the 30 patients who experienced medical errors/negligence claims, 18 reported permanent or long-term physical and emotional effects. Forty-two of 48 (87.5%) doctors who experienced medical errors/negligence claims reported emotional health impacts. Almost half of doctors involved in negligence claims considered early retirement. Forty-four patients and 154 doctors didn't experience errors but reported their patient safety concerns. Doctors were more concerned about communication and administrative errors, staffing and organisational factors compared to patients. Multiple barriers to error reporting were highlighted.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to assess patients' and doctors' patient safety views and medical error/negligence claims experiences in breast cancer care in Ireland. Experience of medical error/negligence claims had long-lasting implications for both groups. Doctors were concerned about a multitude of errors and causative factors. Failure to embed these findings is a missed opportunity to improve safety.

摘要

简介

不良事件可能危及乳腺癌的治疗效果。了解并整合患者和医生的观点到护理轨迹中,可以提高患者安全性。本研究评估了他们对医疗差错和患者安全的看法和经验。

方法

为爱尔兰科克大学医院癌症中心的患者和乳腺癌医生开发了一个横断面、定量的 20-40 项问卷,包括人口统计学、医疗差错经历、患者安全意见和关注点。

结果

184 名患者和 116 名医生完成了调查。其中,41.4%的医生认为过去五年患者安全状况恶化,54.3%的医生认为与患者相比,患者安全措施不足,而分别只有 13.0%和 27.7%的患者有此看法。在经历过医疗差错/疏忽索赔的 30 名患者中,有 18 名报告了永久性或长期的身体和情绪影响。在经历过医疗差错/疏忽索赔的 48 名医生中,有 42 名报告了情绪健康受到影响。近一半涉及过失索赔的医生考虑提前退休。有 44 名患者和 154 名医生没有经历过错误,但报告了他们的患者安全问题。与患者相比,医生更关注沟通和行政错误、人员配备和组织因素。报告错误存在多种障碍。

结论

这是第一项评估爱尔兰乳腺癌护理中患者和医生对患者安全看法和医疗差错/疏忽索赔经验的研究。医疗差错/疏忽索赔的经历对两组都有持久的影响。医生对多种错误和原因因素感到担忧。未能将这些发现纳入其中是错失提高安全性的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/c0fea5c0ced9/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/bc0a6c173005/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/fb99089a90a0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/168204b4954a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/29ec1582b082/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/c0fea5c0ced9/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/bc0a6c173005/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/fb99089a90a0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/168204b4954a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/29ec1582b082/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/285e/10943021/c0fea5c0ced9/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' and doctors' views and experiences of the patient safety trajectory of breast cancer care.患者和医生对乳腺癌护理患者安全轨迹的看法和经验。
Breast. 2024 Jun;75:103699. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103699. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey.澳大利亚医生医疗过失索赔的职业和心理社会预测因素:MABEL 调查的前瞻性队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):e055432. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055432.
3
Doctors' views of attitudes towards peer medical error.医生对同行医疗错误态度的看法。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Feb;86(1012):123-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025015.
4
Attitudes of doctors and nurses to patient safety and errors in medical practice in the Gaza-Strip: a cross-sectional study.加沙地带医生和护士对医疗实践中患者安全和错误的态度:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 5;9(8):e026788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026788.
5
Medical negligence claims and the health and life satisfaction of Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey.医疗事故索赔与澳大利亚医生的健康和生活满意度:对 MABEL 调查的前瞻性队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 19;12(5):e059447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059447.
6
Medical error reporting among physicians and nurses in Uganda.乌干达医生和护士的医疗差错报告情况。
Afr Health Sci. 2019 Dec;19(4):3107-3117. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i4.33.
7
Closed medical negligence claims can drive patient safety and reduce litigation.封存医疗过失索赔可推动患者安全并减少诉讼。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1398-404. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2308-5.
8
Mediating Effects of Patients' Stigma and Self-Efficacy on Relationships Between Doctors' Empathy Abilities and Patients' Cellular Immunity in Male Breast Cancer Patients.男性乳腺癌患者中,医生共情能力与患者细胞免疫功能关系与患者污名感和自我效能的中介作用
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jun 12;24:3978-3986. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910794.
9
Online patient safety education programme for junior doctors: is it worthwhile?面向初级医生的在线患者安全教育计划:是否值得?
Ir J Med Sci. 2016 Feb;185(1):51-8. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1218-9. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Medical errors: patients' opinion, lawyers' standpoint, medical doctrine and practice of the european court of human rights.医疗差错:患者观点、律师立场、医学学说与欧洲人权法院的实践
Wiad Lek. 2019;72(12 cz 2):2416-2420.