Suppr超能文献

全身热疗联合外照射放疗与单纯外照射放疗治疗骨转移疼痛患者的临床疗效比较:一项 III 期临床试验研究。

Clinical effectiveness of combined whole body hyperthermia and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) versus EBRT alone in patients with painful bony metastases: A phase III clinical trial study.

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Radiation Technology, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Therm Biol. 2024 Feb;120:103804. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103804. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the response rate, pain relief duration, and time it took for pain to decline or resolve after radiation therapy (RT) with or without fever-range Whole Body Hyperthermia (WBH) in bony metastatic patients with mainly primary tumor of prostate and breast cancer leading to bone pain.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Bony metastatic patients with pain score ≥4 on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) underwent RT of 30 Gy in 10 fractions in combination with WBH with nursing care under medical supervision versus RT-alone. WBH application time was 3-4 h in three fractions with at least 48-h intervals. All patients were stratified primary site, breast or prostate cancer vs others, BPI score, and exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) (BPI equal to zero with no increase of analgesics) within two months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Based on this study, the RT-alone group showed the worst pain. The study was terminated after the enrollment of a total of 61 patients, 5 years after the first enrollment (April 2016 to February 2021). Finally, the CR rate in RT + WBH revealed the most significant difference with RT-alone, 47.4% versus 5.3% respectively within 2 months post-treatment (P-value <0.05). The time of complete pain relief was 10 days for RT + WBH, while the endpoint was not reached during the RT-alone arm. Pain progression or stable disease was observed in half of the patients in RT-alone group within 4 weeks after treatment. However, this score was near zero in RT + WBHT patients in two months post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

WBH plus RT showed significant increases in pain relief and shorter response time in comparison with RT-alone for patients with bone metastatic lesions.

摘要

目的

评估在伴有或不伴有发热范围全身热疗(WBH)的情况下,接受放疗(RT)的前列腺癌和乳腺癌为主的骨转移患者的反应率、疼痛缓解持续时间以及疼痛缓解所需时间。

材料与方法

采用 Brief Pain Inventory(BPI)评分≥4 分的骨转移疼痛患者,接受 30Gy/10 次分割的 RT 联合有医护监督的 WBH 治疗,或单独接受 RT 治疗。WBH 应用时间为 3-4 小时,分为 3 次,间隔至少 48 小时。所有患者均按原发部位(乳腺癌或前列腺癌与其他部位)、BPI 评分和排除标准分层。主要终点为 2 个月随访期内的完全缓解(CR)(BPI 等于零且镇痛药未增加)。

结果

根据这项研究,单独接受 RT 的患者疼痛最严重。在总共 61 例患者入组后 5 年(2016 年 4 月至 2021 年 2 月),该研究终止。最终,RT+WBH 组的 CR 率与单独 RT 组相比差异最显著,分别为 47.4%和 5.3%(P 值<0.05)。RT+WBH 组完全缓解的时间为 10 天,而单独 RT 组未达到该终点。在单独 RT 组中,有一半的患者在治疗后 4 周内出现疼痛进展或稳定疾病,但在治疗后 2 个月,该评分在 RT+WBH 组中接近为零。

结论

与单独 RT 相比,WBH 联合 RT 可显著增加骨转移患者的疼痛缓解,并缩短反应时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验