Service de chirurgie orthopédique, hôpital Nord, pôle locomoteur, Institut du mouvement et de l'appareil locomoteur, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France; Institut du mouvement et de l'appareil locomoteur, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Hôpital d'instruction des Armées Laveran, 34, boulevard Laveran, 13013 Marseille, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Nov;110(7):103866. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103866. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
Knee periprosthetic femoral fractures (KPPFF) are becoming more frequent due to the increasing number of arthroplasties and the aging population, for whom maintaining autonomy and function remains a challenge. The use of locking plates has improved functional results and promoted the development of "minimally invasive" surgical (MIS) approaches. Despite the availability of literature comparing between different types of osteosynthesis for KPPFF, there is a paucity of information available on the complications of osteosynthesis using locking plates, depending on the approach. We therefore carried out a retrospective multicenter study (nine centers: Dijon, Grenoble, Lille, Marseille, Nice, Paris, Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg, Colmar) as part of a Symposium of the French Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SOFCOT). Following osteosynthesis of KPPFF by locking plates carried out by a standard approach or by a minimally invasive approach (MIS), the objectives were: (1) to compare the complications, (2) to evaluate whether the radiological and clinical results (rate and time of consolidation, resumption of weight bearing, lack of reduction, postoperative autonomy) were comparable in the two groups.
The hypothesis was that performing an MIS approach in these indications does not confer more complications than a standard approach, and rather, the MIS approach offers better functional and radiological results.
Five hundred and seventy-three patients presented with KPPFF over the periods studied (retrospective series from January 2012 to December 2016, then prospective series from January to December 2019). After applying the inclusion criteria (KPPFF by locking plate) and exclusion criteria (tumor context, infectious, intraoperative fractures, fractures on loose prostheses, other osteosynthesis methods, treatment by prosthetic revision, patients under the age of 18, follow-up less than 1-year, incomplete files), a global series of 306 patients was retained. Two groups were created according to the approach performed: a standard approach group (S, n=228) and a minimally invasive approach group (MIS, n=78). The demographic data of the population were recorded, as was the criteria for autonomy (Parker score, place of living). Postoperative complications were sought (infection, mechanical complication, surgical revision). Finally, the radiological and clinical results were evaluated (rate of, and time to consolidation, resumption of weight bearing, lack of reduction, postoperative autonomy).
The comparison of the two subgroups, S and MIS, found complication rates are comparable in the two groups in terms of infections [S group: n=18 (7.9%), MIS group: n=2 (2.6%)], mechanical complications [S: n=23 (10.1%), MIS: n=2 (2.6%)], and surgical revision [S: n=33 (14.5%), MIS: n=7 (8.9%)], and a lack of difference in postoperative autonomy [Parker; S group: 4.7±2.4 (0-9) vs. MIS group: 5±2, 7 (0-9)]. On the other hand, the time to return to weight bearing was shorter in the MIS group [4.3±3.5weeks (0-12) versus 10.1±10.1weeks (0-110), p<0.001]. The rate of nonunion was lower in the MIS group [n=1 vs. n=20, i.e. 1.7% vs. 11.1% (p=0.031)] and the time to consolidation was shorter [7.5±4.3weeks (6-30) versus 15.2±9.4weeks (5-78) (p<0.001)].
Performing an MIS approach in the management of KPPFF by locking plate osteosynthesis does not cause any more complications than a standard approach. In addition, higher consolidation rates can be obtained in shorter periods of time. This study suggests that it proposing osteosynthesis using the MIS approach as a primary surgery is a reasonable choice when treatment using locking plates is chosen for a KPPFF, subject to technical expertise.
III; observational study.
由于关节置换手术数量的增加和人口老龄化,膝关节假体周围股骨骨折(KPPFF)的发病率越来越高,对于老年人来说,保持自主和功能仍然是一个挑战。锁定钢板的使用改善了功能结果,并促进了“微创”手术(MIS)方法的发展。尽管有文献比较了不同类型的 KPPFF 内固定治疗,但关于锁定钢板内固定术的并发症信息却很少,这取决于手术入路。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性多中心研究(九个中心:第戎、格勒诺布尔、里尔、马赛、尼斯、巴黎、圣艾蒂安、斯特拉斯堡、科尔马),作为法国矫形外科学会(SOFCOT)研讨会的一部分。采用标准入路或微创入路(MIS)对 KPPFF 进行锁定钢板内固定后,我们的目标是:(1)比较并发症;(2)评估两种方法的影像学和临床结果(愈合率和时间、负重恢复、复位丢失、术后自主能力)是否具有可比性。
对于这些适应证,采用 MIS 入路并不会比标准入路产生更多的并发症,相反,MIS 入路能提供更好的功能和影像学结果。
研究期间共收治 573 例 KPPFF 患者(回顾性系列为 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月,前瞻性系列为 2019 年 1 月至 12 月)。在应用纳入标准(锁定钢板治疗 KPPFF)和排除标准(肿瘤背景、感染、术中骨折、松动假体骨折、其他内固定方法、假体翻修治疗、<18 岁、随访<1 年、病历不完整)后,保留了 306 例患者的完整资料。根据所采用的手术入路将患者分为两组:标准入路组(S 组,n=228)和微创入路组(MIS 组,n=78)。记录了人群的人口统计学数据,以及自主能力的标准(帕克评分、居住地点)。寻找术后并发症(感染、机械并发症、手术翻修)。最后,评估了影像学和临床结果(愈合率和时间、负重恢复、复位丢失、术后自主能力)。
S 组和 MIS 组的比较发现,两组的感染率[S 组:n=18(7.9%),MIS 组:n=2(2.6%)]、机械并发症[S 组:n=23(10.1%),MIS 组:n=2(2.6%)]和手术翻修[S 组:n=33(14.5%),MIS 组:n=7(8.9%)]相当,术后自主能力无差异[帕克评分;S 组:4.7±2.4(0-9)比 MIS 组:5±2,7(0-9)]。另一方面,MIS 组负重恢复时间更短[4.3±3.5 周(0-12)比 10.1±10.1 周(0-110),p<0.001]。MIS 组非愈合率较低[1 例比 20 例,即 1.7%比 11.1%(p=0.031)],愈合时间较短[7.5±4.3 周(6-30)比 15.2±9.4 周(5-78)(p<0.001)]。
在锁定钢板内固定治疗 KPPFF 中采用 MIS 入路不会比标准入路引起更多的并发症。此外,还可以在更短的时间内获得更高的愈合率。本研究表明,在选择锁定钢板内固定治疗 KPPFF 时,作为一种初步的手术方法,采用 MIS 入路的内固定是合理的选择,但前提是要有技术专长。
III;观察性研究。