• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

POSPOM 评分在预测根治性膀胱切除术后术后并发症风险中的意义。

Interest of the POSPOM score in estimating postoperative complication risk after radical cystectomy.

机构信息

Service d'urologie, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, CS 10217, 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France.

Service d'urologie, hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, Paris, France.

出版信息

Fr J Urol. 2024 Jun;34(5):102610. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102610. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102610
PMID:38460938
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Identifying patients at risk after cystectomy for cancer is essential. The POSPOM score is a non-specific urological surgery score for estimating postoperative hospital mortality. This study sought to validate the POSPOM score for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality after cystectomy.

METHODS

The study retrospectively included all patients undergoing cystectomy for muscle-invasive or locally advanced bladder cancer between 2010 and 2019 in one center. The primary objective was validation of the POSPOM score for calculating severe postoperative morbidity [Clavien-Dindo (CDC)≥3] and 90-day mortality after cystectomy. Secondary objectives were comparison to other predictive scores [Charlson (CCI), ASA].

RESULTS

At 90days, out of 167 patients, 26% (n=44) had a CDC≥3 complication and 8.4% (n=14) had died. POSPOM correlated with the risk of death at 90days (P<0.001) and postoperative transfusion (P<0.01). Patients with CDC≥3 complications had higher CCI and POSPOM (median 6.5 vs. 5, P<0.01 and 6.49% vs. 5.58%, P=0.029, respectively). Patients who died postoperatively had higher CCI and POSPOM (median 8 vs. 6, P<0.001 and 23.9% vs. 5.58%, P<0.001, respectively). The prognostic value of the POSPOM score for predicting mortality appears better [AUC=0.886 (0.798-0.973)] compared with CCI [AUC=0.812 (0.710-0.915)] and ASA [AUC=0.739 (0.630-0.849)], but not for predicting morbidity.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the robustness of the POSPOM score for estimating mortality and its limitations for predicting postoperative morbidity.

摘要

简介

识别膀胱癌根治术后风险患者至关重要。POSPOM 评分是一种用于估计术后院内死亡率的非特异性泌尿外科手术评分。本研究旨在验证 POSPOM 评分预测膀胱癌根治术后术后发病率和死亡率的能力。

方法

本研究回顾性纳入了 2010 年至 2019 年期间在一家中心接受根治性膀胱切除术的肌层浸润性或局部晚期膀胱癌患者。主要目的是验证 POSPOM 评分用于计算根治性膀胱切除术后严重术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo [CDC]≥3)和 90 天死亡率的能力。次要目标是与其他预测评分(Charlson [CCI]、ASA)进行比较。

结果

在 90 天内,167 例患者中有 26%(n=44)出现 CDC≥3 并发症,8.4%(n=14)死亡。POSPOM 与 90 天死亡率(P<0.001)和术后输血(P<0.01)相关。出现 CDC≥3 并发症的患者 CCI 和 POSPOM 更高(中位数 6.5 与 5,P<0.01 和 6.49%与 5.58%,P=0.029)。术后死亡的患者 CCI 和 POSPOM 更高(中位数 8 与 6,P<0.001 和 23.9%与 5.58%,P<0.001)。POSPOM 评分预测死亡率的预后价值似乎优于 CCI [AUC=0.886(0.798-0.973)]和 ASA [AUC=0.739(0.630-0.849)],但预测发病率的价值有限。

结论

本研究证实了 POSPOM 评分用于估计死亡率的稳健性及其预测术后发病率的局限性。

相似文献

1
Interest of the POSPOM score in estimating postoperative complication risk after radical cystectomy.POSPOM 评分在预测根治性膀胱切除术后术后并发症风险中的意义。
Fr J Urol. 2024 Jun;34(5):102610. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102610. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
Validation of the Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.验证术前评分预测根治性膀胱切除术患者术后死亡率的准确性。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):197-200. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 31.
3
Incidence, predictors and validation of risk scores to predict postoperative mortality after noncardiac vascular surgery, a prospective cohort study.非心脏血管手术后术后死亡率预测的风险评分的发生率、预测因子和验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
4
Evaluation of comprehensive complication index versus Clavien-Dindo classification in prediction of overall survival after radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后综合并发症指数与Clavien-Dindo分类法对总生存预测的评估
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Jun;55(6):1459-1465. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03564-7. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
5
Predicting morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy using risk calculators: A comprehensive review of the literature.使用风险计算器预测根治性膀胱切除术的发病率和死亡率:文献综述。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Feb;39(2):109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.032. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
Improving Estimates of Perioperative Morbidity After Radical Cystectomy Using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for Standardized Reporting and Introducing the Comprehensive Complication Index.利用欧洲泌尿外科学会标准化报告质量标准并引入综合并发症指数改善根治性膀胱切除术后围手术期发病率的评估
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
The Comprehensive Complication Index CCI: A proposed modification to optimize short-term complication reporting after cystectomy and urinary diversion.全面并发症指数 CCI:一种改良方案,旨在优化膀胱癌术后尿流改道患者的短期并发症报告。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Apr;37(4):291.e9-291.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.013. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
8
The comprehensive complication index is associated with a significant increase in complication severity between 30 and 90 days after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.综合并发症指数与膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后 30 至 90 天之间并发症严重程度的显著增加相关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):1163-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Surgical High-risk Patients With ASA ≥ 3 Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Morbidity, Mortality, and Predictors for Major Complications in a High-volume Tertiary Center.在高容量三级中心,ASA≥3 的接受根治性膀胱切除术的外科高危患者:发病率、死亡率和主要并发症的预测因素。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Dec;16(6):e1141-e1149. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
10
Standardized assessment of complications in a contemporary series of European patients undergoing radical cystectomy.对接受根治性膀胱切除术的欧洲当代患者系列中并发症的标准化评估。
Int J Urol. 2014 Feb;21(2):143-9. doi: 10.1111/iju.12232. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of postoperative mortality and validation of the 'Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality' (POSPOM) in Thailand.泰国术后死亡率及“术前预测术后死亡率评分”(POSPOM)的验证
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e096705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096705.