Enfermera Clínica, Área del Paciente Crítico, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-GRIN-IDIBELL, Spain; Profesora Asociada, Departamento de Enfermería Fundamental y Clínica, Facultad de Enfermería, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Grupo de Trabajo de Analgesia, Sedación, Contenciones y Delirio de la Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (GT-ASCyD-SEEIUC), Spain.
Grupo de Trabajo de Analgesia, Sedación, Contenciones y Delirio de la Sociedad Española de Enfermería Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (GT-ASCyD-SEEIUC), Spain; UCI Médica y Unidad Coronaria, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain; Grupo de Investigación en Cuidados de la Fundación de Investigación de Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Spain.
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024 Apr-Jun;35(2):e8-e16. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2023.11.002. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Physical restraint use in critical care units is a frequent low-value care practice influenced by numerous factors creating a local culture. The translation of evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice is scarce so, the analysis of interventions to de-adopt this practice is needed. This update aims to describe and identify nonpharmacological interventions that contribute to minimising the use of physical restraints in adult critically ill patients. Interventions are classified into two groups: those that include education alone and those that combine training with one or more components (multicomponent interventions). These components include less restrictive restraint alternatives, use of physical and cognitive stimulation, decision support tools, institutional multidisciplinary committees, and team involvement. The heterogeneity in the design of the programmes and the low quality of the evidence of the interventions do not allow us to establish recommendations on their effectiveness. However, multicomponent interventions including training, physical and cognitive stimulation of the patient and a culture change of professionals and the organisations towards making restraints visible might be the most effective. The implementation of these programmes should underpin on a prior analysis of each local context to design the most effective-tailored combination of interventions to help reduce or eliminate them from clinical practice.
在重症监护病房使用身体约束是一种常见的低价值护理实践,受到许多因素的影响,形成了当地的文化。将基于证据的建议转化为临床实践的情况很少,因此需要分析干预措施以放弃这种做法。本更新旨在描述和确定有助于减少成年危重病患者身体约束使用的非药物干预措施。干预措施分为两组:仅包括教育的干预措施和将培训与一个或多个组成部分(多组分干预措施)相结合的干预措施。这些组成部分包括限制较少的约束替代物、使用身体和认知刺激、决策支持工具、机构多学科委员会和团队参与。方案设计的异质性和干预措施证据质量低,不允许我们确定其有效性的建议。然而,包括培训、患者的身体和认知刺激以及专业人员和组织对使约束可见的文化转变在内的多组分干预措施可能是最有效的。这些方案的实施应基于对每个当地情况的预先分析,以设计最有效的针对性干预措施组合,以帮助减少或消除它们在临床实践中的应用。