Suppr超能文献

超越猜测:外科医生在不稳定手术中确定肩胛盂骨丢失程度的准确性如何?

Beyond guesswork: how accurate are surgeons at determining the degree of glenoid bone loss in instability surgery?

作者信息

LaVigne Caleb A, Griffith Timothy B, Hanson Zachary C, Davis Donald D, Kercher James S, Duralde Xavier A

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wellstar Health Systems, Marietta, GA, USA.

Peachtree Orthopedic Clinic, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2023 Dec 7;8(2):268-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.007. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate measurement of glenoid bone loss (GBL) is critical to preoperative planning in cases of recurrent shoulder instability. The concept of critical bone loss has been established with a value of GBL >13.5% being associated with higher failure rate following arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Advanced imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, can be used to quantify GBL prior to surgery using the best-fit circle technique. Surgeons have traditionally relied on visual inspection of the MRI scan preoperatively or on visual inspection of the glenoid at the time of arthroscopy to determine whether GBL is present. The purpose of this study is to determine if 3 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons could adequately quantify GBL without using best-fit circle measurements on MRI.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed which included 122 patients over an 8-year period that had an arthroscopic Bankart repair performed by 3 fellowship-trained surgeons. In all patients, preoperative MRI scans were retrospectively measured using best-fit circle technique to determine true GBL and compare that to the surgeons' preoperative and intraoperative estimation of GBL.

RESULTS

GBL was correctly identified in only 36% (18/50) of patients when the preoperative best-fit circle measurements were not made. Critical bone loss was missed in 9.8% (12/122) of patients in the study group. The estimated mean bone loss in that group by visual inspection was 11.3% compared to 16% true bone loss measured on MRI. Even in the 18 patients with some identified bone loss prior to surgery, critical bone loss was missed in 6 patients when using visual inspection of the MRI or intraoperative inspection alone.

CONCLUSION

Simple visual inspection of glenoid images on MRI scan and visual inspection of the glenoid at the time of surgery are inaccurate in determining the true extent of GBL especially in cases of subtle bone deficiency. Preoperative planning is dependent on the exact degree of bone deficiency and measurement on the MRI scan using the best-fit circle technique is recommended in all cases of instability surgery.

摘要

背景

准确测量肩胛盂骨丢失(GBL)对于复发性肩关节不稳病例的术前规划至关重要。临界骨丢失的概念已经确立,GBL>13.5%与关节镜下Bankart修复术后较高的失败率相关。先进的成像技术,如磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,可在术前使用最佳拟合圆技术来量化GBL。传统上,外科医生术前依靠对MRI扫描的目视检查或在关节镜检查时对肩胛盂的目视检查来确定是否存在GBL。本研究的目的是确定3名经过专科培训的肩关节外科医生在不使用MRI上的最佳拟合圆测量的情况下能否充分量化GBL。

方法

进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了8年间由3名经过专科培训的外科医生进行关节镜下Bankart修复的122例患者。对所有患者,术前MRI扫描采用最佳拟合圆技术进行回顾性测量,以确定真正的GBL,并将其与外科医生术前和术中对GBL的估计进行比较。

结果

当未进行术前最佳拟合圆测量时,仅36%(18/50)的患者GBL被正确识别。研究组中9.8%(12/122)的患者漏诊了临界骨丢失。该组通过目视检查估计的平均骨丢失为11.3%,而MRI测量的真正骨丢失为16%。即使在术前确定有一些骨丢失的18例患者中,仅使用MRI的目视检查或术中检查时,仍有6例患者漏诊了临界骨丢失。

结论

单纯对MRI扫描上肩胛盂图像的目视检查和手术时对肩胛盂的目视检查在确定GBL的真正程度时不准确,尤其是在存在细微骨缺损的情况下。术前规划取决于骨缺损的确切程度,对于所有不稳手术病例,建议使用最佳拟合圆技术对MRI扫描进行测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea2a/10920134/a68d6591429f/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验