Greif Dylan N, Shaikh Hashim J F, Neumanitis James, Ramirez Gabriel, Maloney Michael D, Bronstein Robert D, Giordano Brian, Nicandri Gregg T, Voloshin Ilya, Mannava Sandeep
University of Rochester Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Rehabilitation, Rochester, NY, USA.
JSES Int. 2023 Dec 14;8(2):304-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.012. eCollection 2024 Mar.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient reported outcomes after arthroscopic extensive débridement of the shoulder with subacromial decompression (SAD) for subacromial impingement using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) system and evaluate if depression (Dep) (clinical or situational) impacts patients achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID).
Preoperative PROMIS Physical function (PF), Mood, and Dep scores were obtained at the closest date prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and postoperative scores were collected at every clinical visit thereafter. Final PROMIS score used for data analysis was determined by the patients final PROMIS value between 90 to 180 days. Clinical Dep was determined by patients having a formal diagnosis of "Depression or Major Depressive Disorder" at the time of their surgery. Situationally depressed patients, those without a formal diagnosis yet exhibited symptomatic depressive symptoms, were classified by having a PROMIS-Dep cutoff scores larger than 52.5.
A total of 136 patients were included for final statistical analysis. 13 patients had a clinical but not situational diagnosis of Dep, 86 patients were identified who had no instance of clinical or situational Dep (nondepressed). 35 patients were situationally depressed. All three cohorts demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative PROMIS Dep, PI, and PF score relative to their preoperative value ( = .001). Situationally depressed patients achieved greater delta PROMIS-Dep compared to patients with major depressive disorder. Depressed patients had a higher chance of achieving MCID for PROMIS-Dep compared to nondepressed patients ( = .01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that underlying Dep did not alter the odds of obtaining MCID compared to nondepressed patients. Nonsmoking patients had significantly greater odds of achieving MCID for PF ( = .02).
Patients improved after undergoing SAD regardless of underlying Dep or depressive symptoms. Depressed patients exhibited greater change in PROMIS scores compared to nondepressed patients. Smoking remains a risk factor for postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing SAD for subacromial impingement. Identifying and counseling patients with underlying depressive symptoms without a formal major depressive disorder diagnosis may lead to improved outcomes. These findings may help guide clinicians in deciding who would benefit the most from this procedure.
本研究的目的是使用患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)评估肩峰下减压(SAD)关节镜下广泛清创治疗肩峰下撞击后患者报告的结局,并评估抑郁(临床或情境性)是否会影响患者达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
在关节镜下肩袖修复术前最近日期获取术前PROMIS身体功能(PF)、情绪和抑郁评分,此后在每次临床就诊时收集术后评分。用于数据分析的最终PROMIS评分由患者在90至180天之间的最终PROMIS值确定。临床抑郁由患者在手术时被正式诊断为“抑郁症或重度抑郁症”确定。情境性抑郁患者,即那些没有正式诊断但表现出有症状的抑郁症状的患者,通过PROMIS抑郁临界值大于52.5进行分类。
共有136例患者纳入最终统计分析。13例患者有临床但非情境性抑郁诊断,86例患者未出现临床或情境性抑郁(非抑郁)。35例患者为情境性抑郁。所有三个队列术后PROMIS抑郁、疼痛干扰(PI)和PF评分相对于术前值均有显著改善(P = 0.001)。与重度抑郁症患者相比,情境性抑郁患者的PROMIS抑郁变化更大。与非抑郁患者相比,抑郁患者达到PROMIS抑郁MCID的机会更高(P = 0.01)。逻辑回归分析表明,与非抑郁患者相比,潜在抑郁并未改变获得MCID的几率。非吸烟患者达到PF MCID的几率显著更高(P = 0.02)。
无论潜在抑郁或抑郁症状如何,患者在接受SAD后均有改善。与非抑郁患者相比,抑郁患者的PROMIS评分变化更大。吸烟仍然是肩峰下撞击接受SAD治疗患者术后结局的一个危险因素。识别并为没有正式重度抑郁症诊断但有潜在抑郁症状的患者提供咨询可能会改善结局。这些发现可能有助于指导临床医生决定谁将从该手术中获益最大。